Double D Construction Group

28 Cited authorities

  1. Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Ass'n

    485 U.S. 439 (1988)   Cited 804 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an adherent was not entitled to challenge a third party's actions that offended his beliefs
  2. Hoffman Plastic Compounds v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    535 U.S. 137 (2002)   Cited 322 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Holding that backpay awards to undocumented workers terminated in violation of the National Labor Relations Act ran counter to federal immigration law
  3. Watt v. Alaska

    451 U.S. 259 (1981)   Cited 610 times
    Holding that agency's interpretation of amendment that was contemporaneous with amendment's passage was entitled to considerably more deference than agency's current, inconsistent interpretation
  4. Ashwander v. Valley Authority

    297 U.S. 288 (1936)   Cited 2,344 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "Court will not pass upon a constitutional question although properly presented by the record, if there is also present some other ground upon which the case may be disposed of"
  5. Sure-Tan, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    467 U.S. 883 (1984)   Cited 416 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that NLRB could order reinstatement with back pay as a remedy for constructive discharge
  6. Air Courier Conference v. Postal Workers

    498 U.S. 517 (1991)   Cited 300 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that postal employees' interests were outside the zone of a statute giving the federal government a postal monopoly, because the "monopoly ... exists to ensure that postal services will be provided to the citizenry at large, and not to secure employment for postal workers"
  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Town & Country Electric, Inc.

    516 U.S. 85 (1995)   Cited 85 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding "employee," as defined by the NLRA, "does not exclude paid union organizers"
  8. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
  9. Michel v. Immigration and Naturalization Serv

    206 F.3d 253 (2d Cir. 2000)   Cited 116 times
    Holding receipt crime was "morally turpitudinous because knowledge is a requisite element . . . and corrupt scienter is the touchstone of moral turpitude"
  10. Beltran-Tirado v. I.N.S.

    213 F.3d 1179 (9th Cir. 2000)   Cited 105 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that § 408(B) is not a CIMT in part because the acts it proscribes are "mala prohibita , not mala in se "
  11. Section 1324 - Bringing in and harboring certain aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1324   Cited 3,485 times   43 Legal Analyses
    Holding liable any person who "transports . . . or attempts to transport" an alien who has entered the United States in violation of the law
  12. Section 1546 - Fraud and misuse of visas, permits, and other documents

    18 U.S.C. § 1546   Cited 1,281 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Penalizing false statement in immigration documents
  13. Section 408 - Penalties

    42 U.S.C. § 408   Cited 1,162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Penalizing false statement to obtain social security benefits
  14. Section 1324a - Unlawful employment of aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1324a   Cited 593 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing the Attorney General to pursue injunctive relief and criminal sanctions in federal district court
  15. Section 5 - Omitted

    42 U.S.C. § 5   Cited 152 times

    42 U.S.C. § 5 EDITORIAL NOTES CODIFICATIONSection, act Mar. 4, 1915, ch. 167, §4, 38 Stat. 1191, provided for appointment to higher grade of officers of Public Health Service detailed with the former Isthmian Canal Commission.

  16. Section 1324c - Penalties for document fraud

    8 U.S.C. § 1324c   Cited 135 times
    Criminalizing the failure to disclose that a person received a "fee or other remuneration" for assisting with false applications for immigration benefits
  17. Section 1259 - Record of admission for permanent residence in the case of certain aliens who entered the United States prior to January 1, 1972

    8 U.S.C. § 1259   Cited 85 times

    A record of lawful admission for permanent residence may, in the discretion of the Attorney General and under such regulations as he may prescribe, be made in the case of any alien, as of the date of the approval of his application or, if entry occurred prior to July 1, 1924, as of the date of such entry, if no such record is otherwise available and such alien shall satisfy the Attorney General that he is not inadmissible under section 1182(a)(3)(E) of this title or under section 1182(a) of this