§

Don Bass Trucking, Inc.

275 N.L.R.B. 1172 (N.L.R.B. 1985)
Don Bass Trucking, Inc.

11 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. United Insurance Co. of America

    390 U.S. 254 (1968)   Cited 326 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "all of the incidents of the relationship must be assessed and weighed with no one factor being decisive"

  2. Local 777, Democratic U. Org. Com v. N.L.R.B

    603 F.2d 862 (D.C. Cir. 1978)   Cited 102 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding "any great amount of deference" "inappropriate" "because of the Board's history of vacillation"

  3. SIDA of Hawaii, Inc. v. NLRB

    512 F.2d 354 (9th Cir. 1975)   Cited 25 times
    Finding independent contractor status where drivers were required to "be neat and courteous, display the SIDA identification on their dome lights and uniforms"

  4. Associated Gen. Contractors, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    564 F.2d 271 (9th Cir. 1977)   Cited 20 times
    In Associated General Contractors v. NLRB, 564 F.2d 271 (9th Cir. 1977), the major parties herein litigated the issue of whether owner-operators were employees under § 2(3) of the NLRA.

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. A. Duie Pyle, Inc.

    606 F.2d 379 (3d Cir. 1979)   Cited 16 times
    Finding that drivers who owned their own trucks and were "not instructed how to do their job" were acting as independent contractors when they delivered coal for defendant

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Deaton, Inc.

    502 F.2d 1221 (5th Cir. 1975)   Cited 19 times
    Denying motion for remand made by employer

  7. Merchants Home Delivery Serv., Inc v. N.L.R.B

    580 F.2d 966 (9th Cir. 1978)   Cited 15 times
    Holding that delivery truck drivers for Exel's predecessor company were properly classified as independent contractors

  8. Air Transit, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    679 F.2d 1095 (4th Cir. 1982)   Cited 8 times
    Finding in independent contractor analysis that "drivers receive no type of training and are not given road tests to evaluate their driving skills"

  9. Ace Doran Hauling Rigging Co. v. N.L.R.B

    462 F.2d 190 (6th Cir. 1972)   Cited 12 times
    In Ace Doran Hauling Rigging Co. v. NLRB, supra, 462 F.2d at 194 (enforcing Board determination of employee status where drivers drove exclusively for company, and performed duties similar to those of other employees, even though driver-owners could refuse trips and were permitted to backhaul), the "exclusivity" principle was utilized to distinguish between those drivers who were employees because they "dr[o]ve `exclusively' for Ace," and those who also performed other, unrelated work for the truckowner and were therefore nonemployees.

  10. Aetna Freight Lines, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    520 F.2d 928 (6th Cir. 1975)   Cited 5 times
    In Aetna Freight Lines, supra, 520 F.2d at 930, the court relied primarily upon two indicia of control, in addition to the elements imposed by governmental regulation, in sustaining a Board finding that an employer/employee relationship existed.