§

Dixie Color Printing Corp.

156 N.L.R.B. 1431 (N.L.R.B. 1966)
Dixie Color Printing Corp.

13 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 710 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  2. Labor Board v. Crompton Mills

    337 U.S. 217 (1949)   Cited 102 times
    Holding unlawful unilateral changes significantly different from "any which the employer has proposed" during bargaining

  3. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  4. Sakrete of Northern Calif., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    332 F.2d 902 (9th Cir. 1964)   Cited 48 times

    No. 18745. May 21, 1964. Rehearing Denied July 9, 1964. Graydon, Head Ritchey, William A. McKenzie, Leslie A. Meek, Cincinnati, Ohio, for petitioner. Arnold Orman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davison and Peter M. Giesey, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Leon Ardzrooni, Neyhart Grodin, San Francisco, Cal., on behalf of amicus curiae-Freight, Construction, General Drivers Helpers, Local 287. Before MADDEN

  5. Snow v. N.L.R.B

    308 F.2d 687 (9th Cir. 1962)   Cited 30 times
    In Snow, both the employer and the Union chose the clergyman who ran the check and he compared signatures, not just names.

  6. National L. Rel. B. v. Sunrise L. Trim

    241 F.2d 620 (2d Cir. 1957)   Cited 26 times

    No. 115, Docket 24222. Argued January 9, 1957. Decided February 18, 1957. Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, Stephen Leonard, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel; Samuel M. Singer, Nancy M. Sherman, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Joseph T. King, Alexander Eltman, New York City, for respondent. Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and LUMBARD and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges. WATERMAN, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board petitions

  7. N.L.R.B. v. White Construction Engineering Co.

    204 F.2d 950 (5th Cir. 1953)   Cited 29 times

    No. 14137. June 5, 1953. Rehearing Denied August 14, 1953. Bernard Dunau, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, David P. Findling, Assoc. General Counsel, George J. Bott, General Counsel, and Ruth V. Reel, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. J. Tom Watson, Tampa, Fla., for respondent. Before BORAH, RUSSELL and STRUM, Circuit Judges. STRUM, Circuit Judge. This is a petition to enforce an order of the National Labor Relations Board, issued January 17, 1952, requiring respondent to bargain with a named

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Taitel

    261 F.2d 1 (7th Cir. 1958)   Cited 16 times

    No. 12335. October 30, 1958. Rehearing Denied December 22, 1958. Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., Sheldon M. Charone, Atty., Chicago, Ill., Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Fannie M. Boyls, Robert J. Wilson, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. George Rose, Indianapolis, Ind., for respondent. Before DUFFY, Chief Judge, HASTINGS, Circuit Judge, and WHAM, District Judge. HASTINGS, Circuit Judge. This case comes before

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Decker

    296 F.2d 338 (8th Cir. 1961)   Cited 13 times

    No. 16738. November 14, 1961. Russell Specter, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., made argument for petitioner. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel-Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Melvin Pollack, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were with him on the brief. John H. Mitchell, Fort Dodge, Iowa, made argument for respondent and was on the brief. Before SANBORN, MATTHES and RIDGE, Circuit Judges. RIDGE, Circuit Judge. This

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Austin Powder Company

    350 F.2d 973 (6th Cir. 1965)   Cited 8 times

    No. 15620. September 22, 1965. Vivian Asplund, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief, for petitioner. Roderick C. Hunsaker, Cleveland, Ohio, and Arthur R. Donovan, Evansville, Ind., for respondent. Before WEICK, Chief Judge, EDWARDS, Circuit Judge and McCREE, District Judge. McCREE, District Judge. The National Labor Relations Board

  11. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,092 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"