Dish Network, LLC

11 Cited authorities

  1. Shearson/Am. Express Inc. v. McMahon

    482 U.S. 220 (1987)   Cited 1,819 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding RICO claims arbitrable and citing Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc., 473 U.S. 614, 636-37, 105 S.Ct. 3346, 87 L.Ed.2d 444 (holding antitrust claims arbitrable because, even if they are arbitrated, antitrust law "will continue to serve both its remedial and deterrent function")
  2. Compucredit Corp. v. Greenwood

    565 U.S. 95 (2012)   Cited 283 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that contract “parties remain free to specify” their choice of judicial forum “so long as the guarantee ” of the Act “is preserved.”
  3. Morris v. Ernst & Young, LLP

    834 F.3d 975 (9th Cir. 2016)   Cited 147 times   52 Legal Analyses
    Holding arbitration provisions mandating individual arbitration of employment-related claims violate the NLRA and fall within the FAA's saving clause
  4. D.R. Horton, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    737 F.3d 344 (5th Cir. 2013)   Cited 141 times   145 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an arbitration agreement that prohibited an employee from pursuing claims collectively did not violate the NLRA and must be enforced
  5. Lewis v. Epic Sys. Corp.

    823 F.3d 1147 (7th Cir. 2016)   Cited 124 times   58 Legal Analyses
    Holding that such waivers violate the Fair Labor Standards Act
  6. Murphy Oil United States, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    808 F.3d 1013 (5th Cir. 2015)   Cited 66 times   103 Legal Analyses
    Upholding its earlier holding in D.R. Horton, Inc. v. NLRB , 737 F.3d 344 (5th Cir. 2013), that arbitration provisions mandating individual arbitration of employment-related claims do not violate the NLRA and are enforceable under the FAA
  7. Inova Health Sys. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    795 F.3d 68 (D.C. Cir. 2015)   Cited 28 times
    Doubting that a company fired its employee for her unprofessional conduct, as it claimed, when that company's investigation into her behavior was "one-sided" and incomplete
  8. Hyundai Am. Shipping Agency, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    805 F.3d 309 (D.C. Cir. 2015)   Cited 2 times
    Declining to endorse the Board's "novel view" but holding that Hyundai's rule prohibiting discussion of all matters under investigation "was so broad and undifferentiated that the Board reasonably concluded that Hyundai did not present a legitimate business justification for it"
  9. Double Eagle Hotel Casino v. N.L.R.B

    414 F.3d 1249 (10th Cir. 2005)   Cited 10 times
    Sustaining Board invalidation of policy defining "confidential information" to include salary information
  10. Section 1 - "Maritime transactions" and "commerce" defined; exceptions to operation of title

    9 U.S.C. § 1   Cited 12,228 times   211 Legal Analyses
    Defining the word "commerce" in the language of the Commerce Clause itself
  11. Section 1 - Organization of customs service

    19 U.S.C. § 1   Cited 13 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Except as hereinafter provided the reorganization of the customs service made by the President and communicated to Congress under date of March 3, 1913, shall, until otherwise provided by Congress, constitute the permanent organization of the customs service. 19 U.S.C. § 1 Aug. 24, 1912, ch. 355, 37 Stat. 434. EDITORIAL NOTES CODIFICATIONSection was superseded in part by section 2071 et seq. of this title. PRIOR PROVISIONSThis was a provision of the sundry civil appropriation act for the fiscal year