§

Diagnostic Center Hospital Corp. of Texas

228 N.L.R.B. 1215 (N.L.R.B. 1977)
Diagnostic Center Hospital Corp. of Texas

7 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Cement Transport, Inc.

    490 F.2d 1024 (6th Cir. 1974)   Cited 35 times

    No. 73-1260. Argued October 17, 1973. Decided January 22, 1974. Rehearing Denied March 4, 1974. Lawrence Levien, N.L.R.B., for petitioner; Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, John S. Irving, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Assistant Gen. Counsel, Alan D. Cirker, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Louis E. Woolery, Louisville, Ky., for respondent; James U. Smith, Jr., Louisville, Ky., on brief. Before CELEBREZZE and MILLER, Circuit Judges, and O'SULLIVAN

  2. Mushroom Transportation Company v. N.L.R.B

    330 F.2d 683 (3d Cir. 1964)   Cited 48 times
    In Mushroom Transportation Co. v. NLRB, 330 F.2d 683, 685 (3d Cir. 1964), we held that to qualify as concerted activity "it must appear at the very least that [the conduct] was engaged in with the object of initiating or inducing or preparing for group action or that it had some relation to group action in the interest of the employees."

  3. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    407 F.2d 1357 (4th Cir. 1969)   Cited 38 times
    Noting that, while timing is a factor, "the thrust of Exchange Parts is the condemnation of granting such benefits with the purpose of affecting the outcome of an election"

  4. Hugh H. Wilson Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    414 F.2d 1345 (3d Cir. 1969)   Cited 37 times
    Finding concerted activity because "[i]n substance, the employees had a gripe. They assembled. They presented their grievance to management. . . ."

  5. Signal Oil and Gas Company v. N.L.R.B

    390 F.2d 338 (9th Cir. 1968)   Cited 25 times
    Finding that a non-union employee engaged in protected concerted activity

  6. Indiana Gear Works v. N.L.R.B

    371 F.2d 273 (7th Cir. 1967)   Cited 23 times
    Posting of ridiculing cartoons merely part of pattern of habitual sarcastic reflections

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Walton Manufacturing Company

    286 F.2d 16 (5th Cir. 1961)   Cited 20 times
    In Walton the court said only that "The requirements of substantiality of evidence and reasonableness of the inferences to be drawn from the evidence are not less in a case of reinstatement and reimbursement than where a cease and desist order is directed against interference" — not that the requirements are more strict.