4 Cited authorities
Pittsburgh Glass Co. v. Board
313 U.S. 146 (1941) Cited 294 timesIn Pittsburgh Glass, the Court held that it was not a denial of due process for the Board to refuse to consider evidence relating to the certification issue when petitioner first sought to introduce such evidence at the unfair labor practice hearing.
Labor Board v. Reliance Fuel Corp.
371 U.S. 224 (1963) Cited 133 timesIn Reliance Fuel Oil Corp., the Board found that Reliance Fuel Oil Corp. ("Reliance"), a New York corporation engaged in the business of selling fuel oil for heating purposes and servicing oil burners and boilers, was engaged in commerce within the meaning of the NLRA because it had "purchased a substantial amount of fuel oil from Gulf, a company concededly engaged in interstate commerce."
Optical Workers' Union v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.
227 F.2d 687 (5th Cir. 1955) Cited 19 timesNo. 15460. December 13, 1955. L.N.D. Wells, Jr., Mullinax Wells, Dallas, Tex., Quentin Keith, Beaumont, Tex., for petitioners. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Chicago, Ill., David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Irving M. Herman, Atty., N.L.R.B., New York City, for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and TUTTLE and BROWN, Circuit Judges. TUTTLE, Circuit
Lucas Cty. Farm Bureau Coop. Ass'n v. N.L.R.B
289 F.2d 844 (6th Cir. 1961) Cited 9 timesNo. 14333. May 10, 1961. Ralph S. Boggs, Toledo, Ohio, for petitioner. Boggs, Boggs Boggs, Toledo, Ohio, on the brief. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Samuel M. Singer, Judith Bleich Kahn, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief, for respondent. Before MILLER, Chief Judge, and MARTIN and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The petitioner seeks to set aside an order of the National