§

D'Armigene, Inc.

154 N.L.R.B. 187 (N.L.R.B. 1965)
D'Armigene, Inc.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Pittsburgh Glass Co. v. Board

    313 U.S. 146 (1941)   Cited 294 times
    In Pittsburgh Glass, the Court held that it was not a denial of due process for the Board to refuse to consider evidence relating to the certification issue when petitioner first sought to introduce such evidence at the unfair labor practice hearing.

  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. N.L.R.B

    328 F.2d 820 (3d Cir. 1964)   Cited 15 times

    No. 14390. Argued October 15, 1963. Decided February 18, 1964. Burton A. Zorn, New York City, Owen B. Rhoads, Philadelphia, Pa., George G. Gallantz, Marvin Dicker, Thomas F. Delaney, Associate Gen. Counsel, New York City, for petitioner; Dechert, Price Rhoads, Philadelphia, Pa., Proskauer, Rose, Goetz Mendelsohn, New York City, of counsel. Warren M. Davison, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davison, Lee M

  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. N.L.R.B

    330 F.2d 62 (6th Cir. 1964)   Cited 9 times

    No. 15366. April 11, 1964. Burton A. Zorn, New York City (Harry E. Marble, Cincinnati, Ohio, George G. Gallantz, Marvin Dicker, Thomas F. Delaney, Associate Gen. Counsel, Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., New York City, on the brief; Marble Vordenberg, Cincinnati, Ohio, Proskauer, Rose, Goetz Mendelsohn, New York City, of counsel), for petitioner. Warren M. Davison, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen

  4. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Esquire, Inc.

    222 F.2d 253 (7th Cir. 1955)   Cited 11 times

    No. 11318. April 29, 1955. David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Julius Topol, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, William J. Avrutis, Washington, D.C., Attys., National Labor Relations Board, for petitioner. Herman Smith, Sidney R. Zatz, Walter N. Kaufman, Chicago, Ill., for respondent. Before LINDLEY, SWAIM and SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judges. SWAIM, Circuit Judge. This case is here on the National Labor Relations Board's petition for enforcement of its order directing