§

Crown Tar and Chemical Works, Inc.

154 N.L.R.B. 562 (N.L.R.B. 1965)
Crown Tar and Chemical Works, Inc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  2. Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    321 U.S. 678 (1944)   Cited 269 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate § 8

  3. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gorbea, Perez & Morell, S. En C.

    300 F.2d 886 (1st Cir. 1962)   Cited 16 times

    No. 5918. March 27, 1962. Norton J. Come, Attorney, Washington, D.C., with whom Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Melvin J. Welles and Morton Namrow, Washington, D.C., Attorneys, were on brief, for petitioner. Jaime Pieras, Jr., San Juan, P.R., with whom Pieras Martin, San Juan, P.R., was on brief, for respondent. Before WOODBURY, Chief Judge, and ALDRICH and GANEY, Circuit Judges. Sitting by designation

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Geigy Co.

    211 F.2d 553 (9th Cir. 1954)   Cited 17 times

    No. 13686. March 17, 1954. Rehearing Denied April 28, 1954. George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, Samuel M. Singer, Thomas R. Haley, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Nathan R. Berke, Attorney, N.L.R.B., San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. Richard Ernst, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent. Before STEPHENS, BONE and ORR, Circuit Judges. BONE, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board petitions for enforcement