Cone Mills Corp. White Oak Plant

17 Cited authorities

  1. Schneider v. State

    308 U.S. 147 (1939)   Cited 1,159 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the government cannot ban handbills, speech, to vindicate its interest in preventing littering, conduct
  2. Marsh v. Alabama

    326 U.S. 501 (1946)   Cited 798 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the First Amendment was violated when a corporate-owned municipality restricted individual's speech
  3. Food Employees v. Logan Plaza

    391 U.S. 308 (1968)   Cited 379 times
    Extending Marsh to cover a private shopping center to the extent that it sought to restrict speech about its businesses
  4. Martin v. Struthers

    319 U.S. 141 (1943)   Cited 577 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding invalid the total prohibition of door-to-door distribution of literature
  5. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

    324 U.S. 793 (1945)   Cited 495 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."
  6. Machinists Local v. Labor Board

    362 U.S. 411 (1960)   Cited 276 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely
  7. Labor Board v. Babcock Wilcox Co.

    351 U.S. 105 (1956)   Cited 294 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board could not require an employer to allow non-employee union representatives to enter the employer's parking lot
  8. A.F. of L. v. Swing

    312 U.S. 321 (1941)   Cited 299 times
    In AFL v. Swing, 312 U.S. 321, 61 S.Ct. 568, 85 L.Ed. 855 (1941), the Illinois Supreme Court had enjoined picketing by a labor union on the ground that there was no dispute between the employer and his immediate employees.
  9. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 695 v. Vogt, Inc.

    354 U.S. 284 (1957)   Cited 163 times
    In Teamsters Union, supra, a railroad was held to be barred from seeking relief in the state courts against a secondary boycott.
  10. Labor Board v. Steelworkers

    357 U.S. 357 (1958)   Cited 72 times
    In United Steelworkers, the Court warned that the NLRA "does not command that labor organizations as a matter of abstract law, under all circumstances, be protected in the use of every possible means of reaching the minds of individual workers, nor that they are entitled to use a medium of communication simply because the employer is using it."