0520150255
07-30-2015
Complainant, v. John M. McHugh, Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.
Complainant,
v.
John M. McHugh,
Secretary,
Department of the Army,
Agency.
Request No. 0520150255
Appeal No. 0120122455
Agency No. ARMIAMI10OCT04852
DECISION ON REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION
Complainant timely requested reconsideration of the decision in Complainant v. Department of the Army, EEOC Appeal No. 0120122455 (January 16, 2015). EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission may, in its discretion, grant a request to reconsider any previous Commission decision where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(c).
At the time of events giving rise to the underlying complaint, Complainant was employed as an Information Technology (Network) Intern at the Agency's Operational Division, 525th Signal Company in Doral, Florida. Complainant filed an EEO complaint alleging that the Agency discriminated against her on the bases of sex (female), disability, age, and reprisal when she was subjected to discrimination and harassment. Complainant raised numerous claims. Our previous decision identified 12 claims.
Complainant did not respond to her right to request a hearing, and thereafter the Agency issued its final Agency decision. Our prior appellate decision affirmed the Agency's final decision, based on the evidence gathered during the investigation, that concluded that Complainant failed to prove her discrimination claims.
In her request for reconsideration, Complainant expresses her disagreement with the previous decision and reiterates arguments she has previously made.1 We emphasize that a request for reconsideration is not a second appeal to the Commission. See EEO MD-110, Ch. 9, � VII.A. Rather, a reconsideration request is an opportunity to demonstrate that the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law, or will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency. Complainant has not done so here.
After reviewing the previous decision and the entire record, the Commission finds that the request fails to meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(c), and it is the decision of the Commission to deny the request. The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 0120122455 remains the Commission's decision. There is no further right of administrative appeal on the decision of the Commission on this request.
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0610)
This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File a Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
July 30, 2015
__________________
Date
1 We note that the Agency dismissed numerous additional claims on February 27, 2011, for failure to contact an EEO counselor in a timely manner. These claims dated from December 8, 2008 through August 27, 2010. Complainant contacted an EEO counselor on October 28, 2010. On page 63 of her appeal, Complainant challenged the dismissal in a short paragraph, without specificity, referencing only a document she submitted. Because there was no specificity or arguments, either in the appeal or in her request for reconsideration, we decline to address the dismissal at this juncture.
---------------
------------------------------------------------------------
---------------
------------------------------------------------------------
2
0520150255
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Office of Federal Operations
P.O. Box 77960
Washington, DC 20013
2
0520150255