0120150747
05-28-2015
Complainant,
v.
Ashton B. Carter,
Secretary,
Department of Defense
(Army & Air Force Exchange Service),
Agency.
Appeal No. 0120150747
Agency No. AAFES15003
DECISION
Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the Agency's decision dated December 3, 2014, dismissing her complaint of unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq., and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 621 et seq.
BACKGROUND
At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant worked as a Logistics Assistant at the Agency's Dan Daniel Distribution Center in Newport News, Virginia.
On October 16, 2014, Complainant filed a formal complaint alleging that the Agency subjected her to discrimination on the bases of sex (female) and age (64) when: (1) in October 2013, she was employed as an intermittent associate and her schedule was changed to exceed 34 hours per week and her request for vacation leave was denied; and (2) on July 3, 2014, she was assessed a fee of $3303.00 by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for working excess hours as established by the Social Security Administration (SSA).
The Agency dismissed claim 1, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2), for untimely EEO Counselor contact and claim 2 for failure to state a claim. The instant appeal followed.
ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS
Claim 1
EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.105(a)(1) requires that complaints of discrimination should be brought to the attention of the Equal Employment Opportunity Counselor within forty-five (45) days of the date of the matter alleged to be discriminatory or, in the case of a personnel action, within forty-five (45) days of the effective date of the action.
The record discloses that the alleged discriminatory event occurred in October 2013, but Complainant did not initiate contact with an EEO Counselor until July 10, 2014, which is well beyond the forty-five (45) day limitation period. The Agency provided ample evidence that Complainant had received training on EEO matters, including the requisite time frames for contacting an EEO counselor.
Accordingly, claim 1 was properly dismissed.
Claim 2
In claim 2, Complainant asserts that the IRS assessed a fee because she worked too many hours in October 2013, contrary to SSA rules. The Commission has held that an employee cannot use the EEO complaint process to lodge a collateral attack on another proceeding. See Wills v. Dep't of Def., EEOC Request No. 05970596 (July 30, 1998); Kleinman v. U.S. Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05940585 (Sept. 22, 1994); Lingad v. U.S. Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05930106 (June 25, 1993). The proper forum for Complainant to raise matters involving the IRS or SSA is within their respective processes. To the extent that Complainant is alleging that the IRS was the result of the Agency's actions in claim 1, it is a statement of the alleged harm incurred because of the actions in claim 1 and not an independent claim of discrimination.
Accordingly, the Agency's final decision dismissing Complainant's complaint is AFFIRMED.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0610)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610)
You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File a Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
May 28, 2015
__________________
Date
2
0120150747
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Office of Federal Operations
P.O. Box 77960
Washington, DC 20013
2
0120150747