§
Commercial Candy

11 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. American Ins. Co.

    343 U.S. 395 (1952)   Cited 269 times
    Holding the degree of discretion in a CBA "is an issue for determination across the bargaining table, not by the Board"

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Reed Prince MFG

    205 F.2d 131 (1st Cir. 1953)   Cited 118 times
    In Reed Prince, supra, this court affirmed the Board's finding of refusal to bargain in good faith only "[a]fter an attentive review of the entire record of the bargaining negotiations."

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Herman Sausage Co

    275 F.2d 229 (5th Cir. 1960)   Cited 79 times
    In NLRB v. Herman Sausage Co., 275 F.2d 229 (5th Cir. 1960), our circuit held that "generally speaking, the freedom to grant a unilateral wage increase "is limited to cases where there has been a bona fide but unsuccessful attempt to reach an agreement with the union, or where the union bears the guilt for having broken off relations.' NLRB v. Andrew Jergens Co., 9 Cir., 1949, 175 F.2d 130, 136, cert. denied, 338 U.S. 827, 70 S.Ct. 76, 94 L.Ed. 503.

  4. Rockingham Machine-Lunex Company v. N.L.R.B

    665 F.2d 303 (8th Cir. 1981)   Cited 14 times
    Stating that "when a party has relevant evidence within its control which it fails to produce, that failure gives rise to an inference that the evidence is unfavorable to the party"

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Holmes Tuttle Broadway Ford

    465 F.2d 717 (9th Cir. 1972)   Cited 22 times
    In NLRB v. Holmes Tuttle Broadway Ford, Inc., 465 F.2d 717 (9th Cir. 1972), the court found substantial evidence of bad faith where the Company, after months of bargaining leading to the Union's acceptance of its proposals, raised spurious objections to its own proposals, and then stated that it would only sign a contract of seven weeks duration.

  6. K-Mart Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    626 F.2d 704 (9th Cir. 1980)   Cited 13 times

    No. 79-7249. Argued and Submitted August 12, 1980. Decided August 29, 1980. Carl W. Robertson, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner. Jerrold J. Wohlgemuth, Washington, D.C., for respondent. On Petition to Set Aside and on Cross-Application to Enforce an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before WRIGHT and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges, and BELLONI, District Judge. Honorable Robert C. Belloni, United States District Judge of the District of Oregon, sitting by designation. EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit

  7. Sweeney Company v. N.L.R.B

    437 F.2d 1127 (5th Cir. 1971)   Cited 22 times
    Upholding Board's decision that employer bargained in bad faith because would not negotiate on Dues Check-Off provision

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Motors, Inc.

    603 F.2d 604 (7th Cir. 1979)   Cited 13 times

    No. 78-2340. Argued June 4, 1979. Decided July 16, 1979. This appeal was originally decided by unreported order on July 16, 1979. See Circuit Rule 35. The Court has subsequently decided to issue the decision as an opinion. Edward S. Dorsey, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Arthur D. Rutkowski, Evansville, Ind., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before CASTLE, Senior Circuit Judge, CUMMINGS and BAUER, Circuit Judges. CUMMINGS, Circuit Judge. On

  9. Majure v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    198 F.2d 735 (5th Cir. 1952)   Cited 21 times

    No. 13762. July 18, 1952. E.L. Snow, J.A. Covington, Jr., Meridian, Miss., for petitioner. John F. Preston, Jr., A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, D.P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., National Labor Relations Board. Before HOLMES, RUSSELL and RIVES, Circuit Judges. RUSSELL, Circuit Judge. L.L. Majure and Mrs. Jo M. Majure, trading as Majure Transport Company, which will be referred to herein as the company, or employer, petition this Court to review and set aside an order

  10. Vanderbilt Products, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    297 F.2d 833 (2d Cir. 1961)   Cited 8 times

    No. 91, Docket 26798. Argued November 28, 1961. Decided December 22, 1961. Nathan Goldman, of Garmesey, Goldman Garmesey, New York City (Abraham L. Bauman, Brooklyn, N.Y., on the brief), for petitioner. Melvin Pollack, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Standau E. Weinbrecht, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent