Comite de Empleados de Simmons, Inc.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council

    341 U.S. 675 (1951)   Cited 494 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce
  2. United States v. Hutcheson

    312 U.S. 219 (1941)   Cited 382 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that jurisdictional dispute between two unions is a labor dispute
  3. Electrical Workers v. Labor Board

    341 U.S. 694 (1951)   Cited 246 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the prohibition of picketing in furtherance of unlawful objectives is not an abridgement of free speech
  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ford Radio & Mica Corp.

    258 F.2d 457 (2d Cir. 1958)   Cited 18 times
    Noting that when motivation of employer in taking certain action is at issue, "[the General Counsel's] refusal to elicit th[e] readily available and crucial testimony of a disinterested witness may well be taken to mean that the information was adverse to his case."
  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local 50

    245 F.2d 542 (2d Cir. 1957)   Cited 18 times

    No. 241, Docket 24293. Argued February 15, 1957. Decided May 23, 1957. Theophil C. Kammholz, General Counsel, Stephen Leonard, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Norton J. Come, Franklin C. Milliken, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Howard N. Meyer, O'Dwyer Bernstien, New York City, for respondent. Before HINCKS, LUMBARD and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges. LUMBARD, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board petitions for enforcement of its order directing the

  6. Douds v. Local 1250, Etc

    173 F.2d 764 (2d Cir. 1949)   Cited 24 times
    In Douds, Judge Hand approved of and followed Attorney General Tom C. Clark's opinion that the Railway Labor Act invalidates a collective bargaining agreement that prevents an individual from negotiating with the carriers through his own union representative in settling grievances.
  7. National Labor Rel. Board v. I.B.S. Mfg. Co.

    210 F.2d 634 (5th Cir. 1954)   Cited 15 times

    No. 14545. February 23, 1954. Rehearing Denied March 26, 1954. A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., David P. Findling, Asso. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Frederick U. Reel, Atty., N.L.R.B., George J. Bott, General Counsel, N.L.R.B., Louis Schwartz, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Leslie Darden, New Albany, Miss., Alexander E. Wilson, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., G. Maynard Smith (of Wilson, Branch Smith), Atlanta, Ga., Fred B. Smith, Ripley, Miss., for respondents. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Int'l Woodworkers

    243 F.2d 745 (5th Cir. 1957)   Cited 9 times

    No. 16388. April 26, 1957. Rosanna A. Blake, Atty., N.L.R.B., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Kenneth C. McGuiness, Gen. Counsel, Stephen Leonard, Associate Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. J.R. Goldthwaite, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., Quitman Ross, Laurel, Miss., Adair Goldthwaite, Atlanta, Ga., Cooper, Mitch Black, Birmingham, Ala., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and TUTTLE and JONES, Circuit Judges. TUTTLE, Circuit Judge. This

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Communications Workers of America

    266 F.2d 823 (6th Cir. 1959)   Cited 4 times

    No. 13729. May 14, 1959. Nancy M. Sherman, Washington, D.C. (Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Fannie M. Boyls, Attorney N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. J.R. Goldthwaite, Jr., of Adair Goldthwaite, Atlanta, Ga. (Kane Koons, Charles V. Koons, Washington, D.C., on brief), for respondents. Before SIMONS and ALLEN, Circuit Judges, and CHOATE, District Judge. PER CURIAM. This cause came on to be

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Texas Natural

    253 F.2d 322 (5th Cir. 1958)   Cited 4 times

    No. 16665. March 18, 1958. Stephen Leonard, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., William J. Avrutis, Atty., Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. C.A. Kothe, W.H. Eyssen, Jr., Tulsa, Okla., for respondent. Before TUTTLE, JONES and BROWN, Circuit Judges. JONES, Circuit Judge. Since so much in this case is dependent upon the factual situation, it becomes necessary to relate the chain of events in some detail. The respondent, Texas