Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Buffalo

8 Cited authorities

  1. Sure-Tan, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    467 U.S. 883 (1984)   Cited 416 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that NLRB could order reinstatement with back pay as a remedy for constructive discharge
  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J. H. Rutter-Rex Manufacturing Co.

    396 U.S. 258 (1969)   Cited 184 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB "is not required to place the consequences of its own delay, even if inordinate, upon wronged employees to the benefit of wrongdoing employers."
  3. Manhattan Eye Ear & Throat Hospital v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    942 F.2d 151 (2d Cir. 1991)   Cited 31 times
    Authorizing the Board to issue orders requiring such action "as will effectuate the policies of [the NLRA]"
  4. N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc.

    311 F.2d 447 (8th Cir. 1963)   Cited 71 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc., 311 F.2d 447, 454 (C.A. 8), it is said that "in a back pay proceeding the burden is upon the General Counsel to show the gross amounts of back pay due.
  5. Stone Boat Yard v. N.L.R.B

    715 F.2d 441 (9th Cir. 1983)   Cited 22 times
    Concluding that knowledge possessed by union members was not attributable to union because there was no evidence in the record that the members were agents of the union
  6. N.L.R.B. v. Transport Service Co.

    973 F.2d 562 (7th Cir. 1992)   Cited 6 times

    No. 91-2049. Argued January 17, 1992. Decided August 26, 1992. Robert J. Englehart (argued), N.L.R.B., Contempt Litigation Branch, Washington, D.C., Elizabeth Kinney, N.L.R.B., Region 13, Chicago, Ill., Aileen A. Armstrong, Collis Suzanne Stocking, N.L.R.B., Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Leonard R. Kofkin (argued), Fagel Haber, Chicago, Ill., for respondent. Before FLAUM, and MANION, Circuit Judges, and CURRAN, District Judge. Hon. Thomas J. Curran, District

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Buffalo

    936 F.2d 122 (2d Cir. 1991)   Cited 3 times
    In NLRB v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 936 F.2d 122, 127 (2d Cir. 1991) (Coca-Cola II), we ruled, enforcing Coca-Cola I, 299 N.L.R.B. at 989, that Orchard Park was a "spinoff" of Tonawanda, with the result that the Orchard Park employees were subject to the terms of the existing Tonawanda collective bargaining agreement.
  8. Section 6621 - Determination of rate of interest

    26 U.S.C. § 6621   Cited 1,873 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Applying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions