CNN America, Inc.
5 Cited authorities
Smith Wesson v. United States
782 F.2d 1074 (1st Cir. 1986) Cited 35 timesDenying a weapon-supply contract to plaintiff because plaintiff's weapons did not pass military testing did not implicate plaintiff's liberty interests
U.S. v. Sheffield
55 F.3d 341 (8th Cir. 1995) Cited 13 timesIn United States v. Sheffield, 55 F.3d 341, 343 (8th Cir. 1995), it was held that "Rule 612 is not a vehicle for a plenary search for contradictory or rebutting evidence that may be in a file but rather is a means to reawaken recollection of the witness to the witness' past perception about a writing."
In re Comair Air Disaster Litigation
100 F.R.D. 350 (E.D. Ky. 1983) Cited 16 timesCommenting that, where a witness uses work-product materials to refresh his recollection, the policy in favor of effective cross-examination establishes substantial need for production of those documents, as, in the absence of production, an opposing party " cannot know or inquire into the extent to which the witness's testimony has been shaded by counsel's presentation of the factual background"
Cosden Oil & Chemical Co. v. Karl O. Helm Aktiengesellschaft
736 F.2d 1064 (5th Cir. 1984) Cited 14 timesAffirming jury finding that order divided into four shipments constituted one contract, and that buyer was entitled to offset its damages because of seller's anticipatory repudiation
Rule 612 - Writing Used to Refresh a Witness's Memory
Fed. R. Evid. 612 Cited 517 times 19 Legal AnalysesProviding rules for using a writing to refresh a witness's recollection