Century Woven Label Co.

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

Jul 28, 1938

8 N.L.R.B. 665 (N.L.R.B. 1938)

In the Matter of CENTURY WOVEN LABEL CO. and CENTURY WOVEN
LABEL UNION LOCAL No. 21116, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR
Case No. R-704.-Decided July 08, 1938
Label and Tae Silk Weaving Industry-Investigation of Representatives:
petition for, dismissed, where no question concerning representation has arisen ;
evidence shows that petitioning union is bargaining with company on basis of
oral agreement; showing of membership by intervening union not sufficiently
strong as compared with showing of petitioning union in either unit contended
for, plant-wide or departmental, to raise question of representation.,
Mr. Richard J. Hickey, for the Board.
Mr. Henry Utall, of New York City, for the Company.
'Mr. Louis Josephson, of Trenton, N. J., for the Label Union.
Mr. Alfred Udoff, of New York City, and Mr. Irving Abramson,
of Paterson, N. J., for the T. W. O. C.
Mr. Willard Y. Morris, of counsel to the Board.
DECISION
AND
ORDER
STATEMENT OF TIIE CASE
- On January 14, 1938, Century Woven Label 'Union, Local No.
21116, affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, herein called
the Label Union, filed with the Regional Director for the Second
Region,(New York City) a petition alleging that a question affecting
commerce had arisen concerning the representation of employees of
Century Woven Label Co., Inc.,' Prospect Park, New Jersey, herein
called the Company, and requesting an investigation and certification
of representatives pursuant to Section 9 (c) of the National Labor
Relations Act, 49 Stat. 449, herein called the Act. On February 17,
1938, the National Labor Relations Board, herein called the Board,
acting pursuant to Section 9 (c) of the Act and Article III, Section
3, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-
Series 1, as amended, ordered an investigation' and authorized the
Regional Director to conduct it and to provide for an appropriate
hearing upon due notice. -
'Erroneously referred to in the petition as Century Woven Label Company.
8 N. L. R. B., No. 69.
665
666 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
On March 4, 1938, the Regional Director issued a notice of hearing,
copies of which were duly served upon the Company, the Label Union,
and Textile Workers' Organizing Committee, herein called the
T. W. O. C., a labor organization claiming to represent employees
directly affected by the investigation. Pursuant to the notice, hear-
ings were held on March 28, 1938, and April 9, 1938, at New York
City before Joseph L. Maguire, the Trial Examiner duly designated
by the Board. The Board, the Company, the Label Union and the
T. W. O. C. were represented by counsel and participated in the hear-
ing. Full opportunity to be heard, to examine and cross-examine
witnesses, and to introduce evidence bearing on the issues was afforded
all parties. During the course of the hearing the Trial Examiner
made several rulings on motions and on objections to the admission
of evidence. The Board has reviewed these rulings and finds that no
prejudicial errors were committed. The rulings are hereby affirmed.
Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following :
FINDINGS OF FACT
I. THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY
Century Woven Label Co., Inc., is a New York corporation engaged
in the manufacture and sale of woven labels and tie silks. Its factory
is situated in Prospect Park, New Jersey. In 1937 its total purchases
of raw materials amounted to $100,000. Approximately 95 per cent
of this amount was purchased from sources in States other than New
Jersey and in foreign countries. In the same year the Company's
total sales amounted to nearly $400,000. Approximately 95 per cent
of this amount was shipped to customers outside New Jersey.
II. THE ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED
Century Woven Label Union, Local No. 21116, is a labor organiza-
tion affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, admitting to
its membership production employees of the Company engaged in the
manufacture of labels, but excluding employees engaged in the manu-
facture of tie silks.
Textile Workers' Organizing Committee is a labor organization
.affiliated with the Committee for Industrial Organization. It has
.two locals for employees at the Company's, plant,, Local 87 admitting
to its membership employees engaged in the manufacture of tie silks,
and Local 157 admitting to its membership employees engaged in the
manufacture of labels, both locals excluding executives, foremen, and
clerical employees. ' ' - I I I I ^ I ,. I .,, ..-^^ 'I, I
DECISIONS AND'ORDERS' 667
III. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION' -
The Label Union and'the T.W. O. C. present conflicting claims re-
garding the appropriate unit in this case. The Label Union contends
that the Company's employees in the label department alone,consti-
tute an,appropriate unit. The T. W. O. C. takes the position that all
,6f the Company's employees, 'both in the tie-silk and label depart-
ments, should be included in a single unit. It is unnecessary for us,
however, to resolve this controversy, since the showing of each union
of'the extent of its. representation among the Company's employees
convinces us that a question has not arisen concerning representation
of employees of the. Company.
. The Company's plant is divided into a tie-silk department in which
29 persons are employed and a label department in which 90 persons
are employed :2 In June 1937, the T. W. O. C. executed a closed-shop
,contract with the National Weavers', Institute to be "effective in all
mills and plants engaged in this industry 3 that are owned and oper-
ated by the manufacturers who are members of the Institute." At the
time the contract was executed the Company was a member of the
Institute. Subsequently a dispute arose between the Company and
the T. W. O. C. as to the scope of the contract. The Company con-
tended that the contract applied only to the employees in the tie-silk
department. Accordingly, it apparently enforced • the closed-shop
provision in the.tie-silk, department, but not in the label department.
The T. W. O. C. contended that it applied to the employees in both
departments. This dispute was referred to an impartial chairman
whose decisions on such questions are claimed by the T. W. O. C. to
be"final and binding under the terms of the contract. On November
27, 1937, the impartial chairman ruled "that the agreement affects all
workers in the Century Woven Label Company with the exceptions
expressly, provided for-in Article^2 (c) 4 and the respondent is hereby
ordered, upon request by the Union, to replace all employees who are
not members of the Union with members of the Union as provided for
in' Article 3 '(b) of the agreement." On December 18, 1937, after
reheariing, the• impartial chairman affirmed his decision. The com-
pany did not comply with this decision, claiming that the impartial
chairman was without, jurisdiction to decide the dispute. ,
It was testified at the hearing that the contract expired on March
31, 1938, a date filling between the first and last days of the hearing
B These figures are taken from the pay roll of January 11, 1938, the only pay roll in
evidence.
8 The contract defines "Industry " as including "the manufacture of jacquard , novelty
and fancy broad goods made primarily of silk , rayon or combination thereof."
4 Article 2 ( c) provided : "This agreement shall apply to all employees of the manu-
facturers with the exception of office help , salesmen, watchmen , firemen, truckmen,
executives , superintendents , and foremen , and those doing supervisory work."
668 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
herein. The Company also testified that at the time of the hearing
it was no longer a member of the National Weavers' Institute. At
the hearing, a great deal of time was devoted to the contract and the
rights and duties of the parties thereunder. These matters are not in
issue in the present proceeding; we are confronted with this initial
issue : Is there a question concerning representation of employees of
the Company? For the purpose of determining this issue we will
assume alternately the correctness of each union's claim as to the
appropriate unit.
1. The Label Union claims that only the employees in the label'
department, with certain exceptions, constitute an appropriate bar-
gaining unit. The president of the Label Union testified that it was
organized during the summer of 1937 and installed its, American
Federation of Labor charter in August of that year. He further tes-
tified that the Label Union had succeeded in enrolling virtually all
the Company's employees in the label department. Officials of the
T. W. O. C. did not deny this, but testified that in March 1937, when
the United Textile Workers of America, herein called the U. T. W.,
changed affiliation from the American Federation of Labor to the
Committee for Industrial Organization, the T. W. O. C. by operation
of law succeeded to all members enrolled by the .U. T. ' W. - among the,
employees of the Company; and that thereby the T. W. O. C. had
approximately 27 members among the employees in the label depart-
ment. It was further claimed that the T. W. O. C. had succeeded in,
enrolling an additional 20 members among the employees in that
department. No evidence, other than that stated above, was offered
in support of these claims by the T. W. O. C., and it was admitted
that of these 47 claimed members only one had paid dues since May
1937, which was several months before the Label Union was formed.
In support of its claim the Label Union introduced in evidence 84
signed forms, which confer authority for purposes of representation'
on the American Federation of Labor and all its affiliated organiza-
tions. The Label Union also introduced six signed applications for
membership. The president of the Label Union testified that the sig-
natures on these signed forms and applications were obtained, in
August and September 1937. Comparing these signatures with the
names on the Company's pay roll of January 11, 1938, we find,that 83
of the 90 names appearing on that pay roll as employees in the label
department, appear among the Label Union's signed forms and
applications.
The Label Union alleged in its petition that : "The aforesaid coin-
pany has declared that it will not bargain or deal with the petition-
ing, union unless, and until, it receives the certification of thi's' board
that it represents these workers, and that it is the legal and proper
bargaining agency."
DECISIONS AND ORDERS 669
-However, at the hearing the president of the Label Union and the
superintendent of the Company both testified that the Company had
recognized the Label Union as the representative of the employees in
the label department and had entered into an oral collective bargain-
ing agreement with it under which they are still operating. We find
that a question has .not arisen concerning the representation of the
Company's employees in the label department.
2. The T. W. O. C. contends that all employees of the Company,
with certain exceptions , constitute an appropriate bargaining unit.
As previously found, it is apparent that the T. W. O. C. represents
very few, if any, employees in the label department . Its membership
is confined almost exclusively to employees in the tie -silk department.
Thus, at most , it represents those employees , of whom there were 29
on January 11, 1938. This figure would be slightly less if supervisory
employees are excluded . On the other hand there are slightly less
than 119 employees in the entire plant, excluding clerical and super-
visory employees . In view of the fact that the T. W. O. C.'s repre-
sentation is confined to the employees in the tie -silk department, who
comprise only about one -fourth of all of the employees , we do not
feel that under the circumstances of this case there is a question con-
cerning representation of the employees of the Company in the unit
claimed to be appropriate by the T. W. O. C. -
Since no question concerning representation exists, whichever of
the claimed units is assumed to be appropriate , we find that no ques-
tion has arisen concerning representation of employees of the
Company. -
Upon the basis of the above findings of fact and upon the entire
record in the case, the Board makes the following :
CONCLUSION OF LAW
No question has arisen concerning representation of the employees
,of Century Woven Label Co., Inc., within the meaning of Section 9
(c) of the National. Labor Relations Act.
ORDER
Upon the basis of the foregoing findings of fact and conclusion of
law, the National Labor Relations Board orders that the petition for
investigation and certification filed by Century Woven Label Union,
Local No. 21116, American Federation of Labor, be, and it hereby is,
,dismissed.