Carroll-Naslund Disposal, Inc.
2 Cited authorities
Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board
185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950) Cited 162 times 2 Legal AnalysesIn Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Epstein
203 F.2d 482 (3d Cir. 1953) Cited 23 timesNo. 10888. Argued January 23, 1953. Decided April 15, 1953. Rehearing Denied May 7, 1953. Harvey B. Diamond, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Bernard Dunau, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. James M. Quigley, Harrisburg, Pa. (Samuel A. Schreckengaust, Jr., McNees, Wallace Nurick, Harrisburg, Pa., on the brief), for respondents. Before GOODRICH, STALEY