§

Campbell Soup Co.

152 N.L.R.B. 1645 (N.L.R.B. 1965)
Campbell Soup Co.

5 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Capitol Fish Company

    294 F.2d 868 (5th Cir. 1961)   Cited 58 times
    Holding that the Housekeeping Statute "cannot be construed to establish authority in the executive departments to determine whether certain papers and records are privileged," nor can it "bar a judicial determination of the question of privilege or a demand for the production of evidence found not privileged"

  2. Harvey Aluminum

    335 F.2d 749 (9th Cir. 1964)   Cited 44 times
    In Harvey Aluminum, the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB") issued a complaint charging that the petitioners engaged in unfair labor practice by maintaining surveillance of union activities of employees of Harvey Aluminum, Inc. ("Harvey") and General Engineering, Inc. ("General").

  3. Sperandeo v. Milk Drivers Dairy Employees

    334 F.2d 381 (10th Cir. 1964)   Cited 28 times
    Holding that federal agencies are bound by discovery rules in the same manner as any other litigant

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Cadillac Wire Corp.

    290 F.2d 261 (2d Cir. 1961)   Cited 4 times

    No. 309, Docket 26688. Argued April 12, 1961. Decided May 10, 1961. Glen M. Bendixsen, Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for the Board. Sol E. King, New York City, for the Cadillac Corporation. Harry Weinstock, Henry Brickman, New York City, Weinstock Tauber, New York City, of counsel, for the Union. Before FRIENDLY, HAND and

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Natl. Licorice Co.

    104 F.2d 655 (2d Cir. 1939)   Cited 25 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. National Licorice Co., 2 Cir., 104 F.2d 655, 657, cited by the Board, Judge Learned Hand's opinion accepts the Greyhound decision without mentioning the Morgan case, considered infra.