Butchers' Union Local 120, Etc.

Labor Board v. Brown
380 U.S. 278 (1965) Cited 473 times 2 Legal Analyses
Approving finding of § 8 violation when "employers' conduct is demonstrably so destructive of employee rights and so devoid of significant service to any legitimate business end that it cannot be tolerated consistently with the Act"
H.J. Heinz Co. v. Labor Board
311 U.S. 514 (1941) Cited 241 times 1 Legal Analyses
In H.J. Heinz Co. v. N.L.R.B., 311 U.S. 514, 61 S.Ct. 320, 85 L.Ed. 309 and Cox v. Gatliff Coal Co., D.C., 59 F. Supp. 882, affirmed 6 Cir., 152 F.2d 52, it was stated that the Act contemplated that a collective bargaining agreement be in writing.
N.L.R.B. v. Brown
319 F.2d 7 (10th Cir. 1963) Cited 5 times
No. 7089. June 17, 1963. Melvin J. Welles, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Dominick L. Manoli, Marcel Mallet-Prevost and Gary Green, Washington, D.C., with him on the brief), for petitioner. William L. Keller, Dallas, Tex. (Clark, Reed Clark, Robert L. Clark and Allen Butler, Dallas, Tex., with him on the brief), for respondents. Joseph M. McLaughlin and Frederick A. Morgan, of McLaughlin McLaughlin, Los Angeles, Cal., on the brief for Food Employers Council, Inc., California Ass'n of Employers