Brown Lumber Co.

13 Cited authorities

Morgan v. United States
304 U.S. 1 (1938) Cited 634 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that it is "not the function of the court to probe the mental processes of the Secretary"
Labor Board v. Express Pub. Co.
312 U.S. 426 (1941) Cited 506 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"
Brooks v. Labor Board
348 U.S. 96 (1954) Cited 300 times
Holding that an employer has a duty to bargain in good faith for one year beginning on the date of certification of the bargaining representative by the Board
Labor Board v. Tower Co.
329 U.S. 324 (1946) Cited 259 times
Describing the Board's goals for its election rules and regulations
Pittsburgh Glass Co. v. Board
313 U.S. 146 (1941) Cited 294 times
In Pittsburgh Glass, the Court held that it was not a denial of due process for the Board to refuse to consider evidence relating to the certification issue when petitioner first sought to introduce such evidence at the unfair labor practice hearing.
Labor Board v. Donnelly Co.
330 U.S. 219 (1947) Cited 128 times
Holding that a hearing examiner's prior adverse ruling did not prevent him from adjudicating the same case on retrial even though the examiner's initial decision had been reversed for improper exclusion of evidence
Willapoint Oysters v. Ewing
174 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1949) Cited 130 times
In Willapoint Oysters v. Ewing (9th Cir. 1949) 174 F.2d 676, cert. denied 338 U.S. 860, 70 S.Ct. 101, 94 L.Ed. 527, rehearing den. 339 U.S. 945, 70 S.Ct. 793, 94 L.Ed. 1360, this Court relied upon Consolidated Edison to hold that hearsay alone, or even hearsay corroborated by a mere scintilla could never provide substantial evidence to support an administrative finding.
Chicago, B. Q. Ry. Co. v. Babcock
204 U.S. 585 (1907) Cited 138 times
Analogizing state tax assessment board members' testimony concerning "operation of * * * minds" to prohibition against allowing jury members to testify as to "the motives and influences that led to their verdict"
National Lbr. Rel. Bd. v. Botany Worsted Mills
133 F.2d 876 (3d Cir. 1943) Cited 42 times
Nos. 8132, 8133. Argued November 18, 1942. Decided January 18, 1943. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce the Board's order against the Botany Worsted Mills, and petition by the Botany Worsted Mills to set aside the Board's order. The Botany Worsted Mills moved to consolidate the petitions and for leave to adduce additional evidence. Petition of Board granted with modification in accordance with opinion, and petition of the respondent
National Labor Relations Bd. v. Air Associates
121 F.2d 586 (2d Cir. 1941) Cited 34 times
In National Labor Relations Board v. Air Associates, Inc., 2 Cir., 121 F.2d 586, the court held at page 592: "Section 8(3) requires that the discrimination in regard to tenure of employment have both the purpose and effect of discouraging union membership."

Brown Lumber Co.

13 Cited authorities

Holding that it is "not the function of the court to probe the mental processes of the Secretary"

Holding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"

Holding that an employer has a duty to bargain in good faith for one year beginning on the date of certification of the bargaining representative by the Board

Describing the Board's goals for its election rules and regulations

In Pittsburgh Glass, the Court held that it was not a denial of due process for the Board to refuse to consider evidence relating to the certification issue when petitioner first sought to introduce such evidence at the unfair labor practice hearing.

Holding that a hearing examiner's prior adverse ruling did not prevent him from adjudicating the same case on retrial even though the examiner's initial decision had been reversed for improper exclusion of evidence

Analogizing state tax assessment board members' testimony concerning "operation of * * * minds" to prohibition against allowing jury members to testify as to "the motives and influences that led to their verdict"

In National Labor Relations Board v. Air Associates, Inc., 2 Cir., 121 F.2d 586, the court held at page 592: "Section 8(3) requires that the discrimination in regard to tenure of employment have both the purpose and effect of discouraging union membership."