Bristol Farms

13 Cited authorities

Board of Regents v. Roth
408 U.S. 564 (1972) Cited 14,910 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that where a public employee's appointment terminated on a particular date and there was no provision for renewal after that date, the employee "did not have a property interest sufficient to require . . . a hearing when [the officials] declined to renew his contract of employment."
Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins
447 U.S. 74 (1980) Cited 735 times 10 Legal Analyses
Holding that "views expressed by members of the public" in a privately owned shopping mall "will not likely be identified with those of the owner"
Garner v. Teamsters Union
346 U.S. 485 (1953) Cited 690 times 2 Legal Analyses
In Garner the emphasis was not on two conflicting labor statutes but rather on two similar remedies, one state and one federal, brought to bear on precisely the same conduct.
Lechmere, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
502 U.S. 527 (1992) Cited 156 times 18 Legal Analyses
Holding that Board erred in finding that employer should have allowed union on its premises because it had no other way to reach its target audience, inasmuch as in reaching its decision the Board misconstrued prior Supreme Court precedent
Labor Board v. Babcock Wilcox Co.
351 U.S. 105 (1956) Cited 294 times 19 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Board could not require an employer to allow non-employee union representatives to enter the employer's parking lot
Robins v. Pruneyard Shopping Center
23 Cal.3d 899 (Cal. 1979) Cited 228 times 12 Legal Analyses
Holding that California's constitution protected free speech and petitioning, reasonably exercised, in privately owned shopping centers
Labor Board v. Drivers Local Union
362 U.S. 274 (1960) Cited 109 times 1 Legal Analyses
In NLRB v. Drivers Local 639, 362 U.S. 274 (1960), the Court held that § 8(b)(1)(A) was "a grant of power to the Board limited to authority to proceed against union tactics involving violence, intimidation, and reprisal or threats thereof."
Longshoremen v. Ariadne Co.
397 U.S. 195 (1970) Cited 51 times
Holding that American residents hired by a foreign ship to work on an American dock did not involve the internal affairs of a foreign ship
In re Lane
71 Cal.2d 872 (Cal. 1969) Cited 50 times 2 Legal Analyses
Emphasizing the public nature of the sidewalk and store
Schwartz-Torrance Inv. Corp. v. Bakery and Confectionery Workers' Union, Local No. 31
61 Cal.2d 766 (Cal. 1964) Cited 57 times 2 Legal Analyses
In Schwartz-Torrance Investment Corp. v. Bakery ConfectioneryWorkers' Union (1964) 61 Cal.2d 766 (Schwartz-Torrance), this court, citing Thornhill and Marsh, found a right to peacefully picket at a privately owned shopping center.

Bristol Farms

13 Cited authorities

Holding that where a public employee's appointment terminated on a particular date and there was no provision for renewal after that date, the employee "did not have a property interest sufficient to require . . . a hearing when [the officials] declined to renew his contract of employment."

Holding that "views expressed by members of the public" in a privately owned shopping mall "will not likely be identified with those of the owner"

In Garner the emphasis was not on two conflicting labor statutes but rather on two similar remedies, one state and one federal, brought to bear on precisely the same conduct.

Holding that Board erred in finding that employer should have allowed union on its premises because it had no other way to reach its target audience, inasmuch as in reaching its decision the Board misconstrued prior Supreme Court precedent

Holding that the Board could not require an employer to allow non-employee union representatives to enter the employer's parking lot

Holding that California's constitution protected free speech and petitioning, reasonably exercised, in privately owned shopping centers

In NLRB v. Drivers Local 639, 362 U.S. 274 (1960), the Court held that § 8(b)(1)(A) was "a grant of power to the Board limited to authority to proceed against union tactics involving violence, intimidation, and reprisal or threats thereof."

Holding that American residents hired by a foreign ship to work on an American dock did not involve the internal affairs of a foreign ship

Emphasizing the public nature of the sidewalk and store

In Schwartz-Torrance Investment Corp. v. Bakery ConfectioneryWorkers' Union (1964) 61 Cal.2d 766 (Schwartz-Torrance), this court, citing Thornhill and Marsh, found a right to peacefully picket at a privately owned shopping center.