§

Breckenridge Gasoline Co.

127 N.L.R.B. 1462 (N.L.R.B. 1960)
Breckenridge Gasoline Co.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Machinists Local v. Labor Board

    362 U.S. 411 (1960)   Cited 276 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely

  2. Brooks v. Labor Board

    348 U.S. 96 (1954)   Cited 300 times
    Holding that an employer has a duty to bargain in good faith for one year beginning on the date of certification of the bargaining representative by the Board

  3. Franks Bros. Co. v. Labor Board

    321 U.S. 702 (1944)   Cited 252 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the legitimacy of the Board's view that the unlawful refusal to bargain collectively with employees' chosen representative disrupts employee morale, deters organizational activities, and discourages membership in unions.

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Textile Mach. Works

    214 F.2d 929 (3d Cir. 1954)   Cited 35 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Textile Machine Works, Inc., 1954, 214 F.2d 929 this court held that a complaint against Textile, alleging violations by it of Section 8(a)(1), (3), 29 U.S.C.A. § 158(a)(1), (3) of the National Labor Relations Act, was barred by the time limitation imposed by Section 10(b), 29 U.S.C.A. § 160(b), where workers had requested reinstatement rather than employment as new employees.

  5. National Labor Bd. v. Sanson Hosiery Mills

    195 F.2d 350 (5th Cir. 1952)   Cited 34 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Sanson Hosiery Mills, 5 Cir., 195 F.2d 350, this court held that when the Board has duly certified a bargaining representative, such certification must be respected by the employer until set aside by the Board, even though the Union has meanwhile lost its majority support of the employees.

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Montgomery Ward

    242 F.2d 497 (2d Cir. 1957)   Cited 23 times

    No. 211, Docket 24251. Argued January 11, 1957. Decided March 18, 1957. Theophil C. Kammholtz, Gen. Counsel, Stephen Leonard, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Samuel M. Singer and Florian J. Bartosic, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Charles J. Barnhill and David L. Dickson, Chicago, Ill., and T.W. Madden, New York, N.Y., for respondent. Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and LUMBARD and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges. LUMBARD, Circuit Judge. The National Labor

  7. Paramount Cap Mfg. Co. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    260 F.2d 109 (8th Cir. 1958)   Cited 17 times

    No. 15985. October 24, 1958. Rehearing Denied November 17, 1958. John R. Stockham, St. Louis, Mo. (Stockham, Roth, Buder Martin, St. Louis, Mo., were with him on the brief), for petitioner. Morris A. Solomon, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Frederick U. Reel, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., were with him on the brief), for respondent

  8. Gibbons v. Brandt

    170 F.2d 385 (7th Cir. 1948)   Cited 20 times

    No. 9378. November 7, 1947. On Rehearing May 4, 1948. Further Rehearing Denied September 23, 1948. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division; John P. Barnes, Judge. Action by Mary Gibbons against Hugo E. Brandt and another to enforce against certain of defendants' real estate, a judgment previously recovered by plaintiff against Jack Cannaven. From an adverse decree, 75 F. Supp. 42, defendants appeal. Reversed with directions. David

  9. Amalgamated Meat Cutters Butch. v. N.L.R.B

    276 F.2d 34 (1st Cir. 1960)   Cited 2 times

    No. 5515. March 22, 1960. Arthur J. Flamm, Boston, Mass., with whom Segal Flamm, Boston, Mass., was on brief, for petitioner. Earle W. Putnam, Attorney, Washington, D.C., with whom Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Melvin J. Welles, Attorney, Washington, D.C., were on brief, for respondent. Before WOODBURY, Chief Judge, and HARTIGAN and ALDRICH, Circuit Judges. HARTIGAN, Circuit Judge. This is a petition