§

Bob Showers Windows and Sunrooms

06-CA-034287 (N.L.R.B. Dec. 14, 2005)
Bob Showers Windows and Sunrooms

10 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board

    379 U.S. 203 (1964)   Cited 731 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  4. U.S. v. Paxson

    861 F.2d 730 (D.C. Cir. 1988)   Cited 49 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding the vice president of a corporation to be an agent of the president for the purposes of 801(d)(D) because the factors which normally make up an agency relationship were present

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Herman Sausage Co

    275 F.2d 229 (5th Cir. 1960)   Cited 79 times
    In NLRB v. Herman Sausage Co., 275 F.2d 229 (5th Cir. 1960), our circuit held that "generally speaking, the freedom to grant a unilateral wage increase "is limited to cases where there has been a bona fide but unsuccessful attempt to reach an agreement with the union, or where the union bears the guilt for having broken off relations.' NLRB v. Andrew Jergens Co., 9 Cir., 1949, 175 F.2d 130, 136, cert. denied, 338 U.S. 827, 70 S.Ct. 76, 94 L.Ed. 503.

  6. Unbelievable v. Nat. Labor Relations Bd.

    118 F.3d 795 (D.C. Cir. 1997)   Cited 18 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Applying the American Rule to National Labor Relations Board proceedings

  7. Public Service Co. of Oklahoma v. N.L.R.B

    318 F.3d 1173 (10th Cir. 2003)   Cited 7 times
    Noting that demonstration of economic exigency justifies prompt implementation of a company's proposals

  8. Kamtech, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    314 F.3d 800 (6th Cir. 2002)   Cited 5 times

    Nos. 01-1391, 01-1558. Submitted: August 7, 2002. Decided and Filed: September 4, 2002. This decision was originally issued as an "unpublished decision" filed on September 4, 2002. On December 3, 2002, the court designated the opinion as one recommended for full-text publication. Appeal from the Court of Appeals, Daughtrey, Circuit Judge. J. Roy Weathersby, Eric K. Smith (briefed), Littler Mendelson, Atlanta, GA, for Petitioner Cross-Respondent. Ailen A. Armstrong, Dep.Asso.Gen.Counsel, National

  9. Dash v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    793 F.2d 1062 (9th Cir. 1986)   Cited 13 times
    Characterizing the employer's burden as an affirmative defense

  10. Uniroyal Technology Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    151 F.3d 666 (7th Cir. 1998)   Cited 2 times
    Noting that union activist's “glowing performance reviews” and willingness to fill in on overtime shifts factored into the analysis of whether union activity was a motivating factor in discharge