§

Bay Counties District Council of Carpenters, Etc.

154 N.L.R.B. 1598 (N.L.R.B. 1965)
Bay Counties District Council of Carpenters, Etc.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Truck Dvrs. Un. L. No. 413, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    334 F.2d 539 (D.C. Cir. 1964)   Cited 56 times

    Nos. 17662, 17663. Argued October 30, 1963. Decided April 9, 1964. Certiorari Denied November 16, 1964. See 85 S.Ct. 264. Mr. David Previant, Milwaukee, Wis., with whom Messrs. Herbert S. Thatcher, Washington, D.C., and L.N.D. Wells, Jr., Dallas, Tex., were on the brief, for petitioners in No. 17,662. Mr. L.N.D. Wells, Jr., Dallas, Tex., with whom Messrs. David Previant, Milwaukee, Wis., and Herbert S. Thatcher, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioners in No. 17,663. Mr. Gary Green, Atty

  2. Construction, Prod. Lab. U. v. N.L.R.B

    323 F.2d 422 (9th Cir. 1963)   Cited 21 times
    Noting that the Supreme Court recognizes a "definite" distinction between an agreement to cease doing business and the cessation itself

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local 825, International Union of Operating Engineers

    326 F.2d 213 (3d Cir. 1964)   Cited 20 times

    No. 14331. Argued October 10, 1963. Decided January 8, 1964. Solomon Hirsh, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, James McC. Harkless, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. John J. Mooney, New York City (Michael Breitkopf, Newark, N.J., on the brief), for respondent. Before STALEY, HASTIE and SMITH, Circuit Judges. STALEY, Circuit Judge. The National Labor

  4. N.L.R.B. v. AMALGAMATED LITHOGRAPHERS OF AM

    309 F.2d 31 (9th Cir. 1962)   Cited 19 times
    In NLRB v. Amalgamated Lithographers of America, 309 F.2d 31, 51 LRRM 2093 (9th Cir. 1962), cert. denied 372 U.S. 943, 82 S.Ct. 936, 9 L.Ed.2d 968 (1963), the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that a union committed an unfair labor practice in refusing to bargain in good faith when the union insisted upon the inclusion of an illegal contract provision.

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local 3, I.B.E.W

    317 F.2d 193 (2d Cir. 1963)   Cited 14 times

    No. 243, Docket 27851. Argued March 5, 1963. Decided April 26, 1963. Solomon I. Hirsh, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Robert Sewell, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Harold Stern, New York City (Norman Rothfeld, New York City, on the brief), for respondent. Before CLARK and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges, and

  6. Smitley v. N.L.R.B

    327 F.2d 351 (9th Cir. 1964)   Cited 10 times

    No. 18295. January 30, 1964. Sweeney, Irwin Foye, Peter W. Irwin, and Mathias Diederich, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioners. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, James C. Paras and Stephen B. Goldberg, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before BARNES, HAMLEY and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges. DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge. Petition to review an order of the National Labor Relations Board which dismissed an unfair labor

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local 3, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

    339 F.2d 600 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 8 times

    No. 213, Docket 27851. Argued October 23, 1964. Decided December 18, 1964. Solomon I. Hirsh, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Robert G. Sewell, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Harold Stern, New York City (Norman Rothfeld, New York City, on the brief), for respondent. Before FRIENDLY, KAUFMAN and ANDERSON

  8. Barker Brothers Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    328 F.2d 431 (9th Cir. 1964)   Cited 5 times
    In Barker Bros., the Board held that no such effect had occurred where "there were only 3 delivery stoppages, 2 work delays, and several delivery delays" and where, in addition, "the record (was) virtually silent as to not only the nature and quantity of the products that failed to reach their destination, but also the impact of the stoppage and/or delays on the Employer's business."

  9. Bonsall v. Humble Oil Refining Company

    201 F. Supp. 516 (W.D. La. 1961)   Cited 7 times

    Nos. 7889, 7890, 7892, 7893. June 6, 1961. Jones Jones, Cameron, La., C.A. Miller, Jr., Lake Charles, La., for plaintiffs. Plauche Stockwell, Lake Charles, La., Bernard J. Caillouet and W.J. McAnelly, Jr., New Orleans, La., for defendant. HUNTER, Judge. These consolidated cases are before this Court by removal from the Fourteenth Judicial District Court for Cameron Parish, Louisiana. The suits were filed against Humble Oil Refining Company and seek the cancellation, for non-payment of royalties,

  10. Bonsall v. Humble Oil Refining Company

    300 F.2d 150 (5th Cir. 1962)   Cited 4 times

    No. 19242. February 26, 1962. Rehearing Denied March 27, 1962. J.B. Jones, Jr., Cameron, La., C.A. Miller, Jr., Lake Charles, La., Jones Jones and Jerry G. Jones, Cameron, La., of counsel, for appellants. W.J. McAnelly, Jr., New Orleans, La., Oliver P. Stockwell, Lake Charles, La., Bernard J. Caillouet, New Orleans, La., Plauche Stockwell, Lake Charles, La., of counsel, for appellees. Before JONES, BROWN and BELL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This appeal challenges the correctness of the District