Bally's Atlantic City

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

Jun 27, 2008

352 N.L.R.B. 768 (N.L.R.B. 2008)

DECISIONS OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
352 NLRB No. 95
768
Bally’s Park Place, Inc. d/b/a Bally’s Atlantic City
and International Union, United Automobile,
Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Work-
ers of America, AFL–CIO. Case 4–CA–36109
June 27, 2008
DECISION AND ORDER
BY CHAIRMAN SCHAUMER AND MEMBER LIEBMAN
This is a refusal-to-bargain case in which the Respon-
dent is contesting the Union’s certification as bargaining
representative in the underlying representation proceed-
ing. Pursuant to a charge filed on April 24, 2008, the
General Counsel issued the complaint on April 25, 2008,
alleging that the Respondent has violated Section 8(a)(5)
and (1) of the Act by refusing the Union’s request to bar-
gain following the Union’s certification in Case 4–RC–
21286. (Official notice is taken of the “record” in the
representation proceeding as defined in the Board’s
Rules and Regulations, Sections 102.68 and 102.69(g);
Frontier Hotel, 265 NLRB 343 (1982).) The Respondent
filed an answer, admitting in part and denying in part the
allegations in the complaint and asserting affirmative
defenses.
On May 12, 2008, the General Counsel filed a Motion
for Summary Judgment. On May 13, 2008, the Board
issued an order transferring the proceeding to the Board
and a Notice to Show Cause why the motion should not
be granted. The Respondent filed a response.
Ruling on Motion for Summary Judgment1
The Respondent admits its refusal to bargain, but con-
tests the validity of the Union’s certification on the basis
of its objections to the election in the representation pro-
ceeding.2
All representation issues raised by the Respondent
were or could have been litigated in the prior representa-
tion proceeding. The Respondent does not offer to ad-
duce at a hearing any newly discovered and previously
unavailable evidence, nor does it allege any special cir-
cumstances that would require the Board to reexamine

1 Effective midnight December 28, 2007, Members Liebman,
Schaumber, Kirsanow, and Walsh delegated to Members Liebman,
Schaumber, and Kirsanow, as a three-member group, all of the Board’s
powers in anticipation of the expiration of the terms of Members Kir-
sanow and Walsh on December 31, 2007. Pursuant to this delegation,
Chairman Schaumber and Member Liebman constitute a quorum of the
three-member group. As a quorum, they have the authority to issue
decisions and orders in unfair labor practice and representation cases.
See Sec. 3(b) of the Act.
2 The Respondent contests the validity of the Union’s certification
on the basis that the Board lacked a quorum on April 11, 2008 when it
issued the Decision and Certification of Representative in the underly-
ing representation case, 352 NLRB 316 (2008). However, this defense
is without merit for the reasons stated above in fn. 1.
the decision made in the representation proceeding. We
therefore find that the Respondent has not raised any
representation issue that is properly litigable in this un-
fair labor practice proceeding. See Pittsburgh Plate
Glass Co. v. NLRB, 313 U.S. 146, 162 (1941). Accord-
ingly, we grant the Motion for Summary Judgment.
On the entire record, the Board makes the following
FINDINGS OF FACT
I. JURISDICTION
At all material times, the Respondent, a corporation,
has been engaged in the operation of a casino at Park
Place and the Boardwalk in Atlantic City, New Jersey,
herein called the Casino.
During the 12-month period preceding issuance of the
complaint, the Respondent, in conducting its business
operations described above, received gross revenues in
excess of $500,000, and purchased and received at the
Casino goods valued in excess of $5000 directly from
points outside the State of New Jersey.
We find that the Respondent is an employer engaged
in commerce within the meaning of Section 2(2), (6), and
(7) of the Act and that the Union, International Union,
United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Imple-
ment Workers of America, AFL–CIO, is a labor organi-
zation within the meaning of Section 2(5) of the Act.
II. ALLEGED UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES
A. The Certification
Following the representation election held on June 2
and 3, 2007, in Case 4–RC–21286, the Union was certi-
fied on April 11, 2008, as the exclusive collective-
bargaining representative of the employees in the follow-
ing appropriate unit:
All full time and regular part time dealers, keno and
simulcast employees employed by Respondent at its
Park Place and The Boardwalk, Atlantic City, New Jer-
sey facility, excluding all other employees, cashiers, pit
clerks, clerical employees, engineers, guards and su-
pervisors as defined in the Act.
The Union continues to be the exclusive representative un-
der Section 9(a) of the Act.
B. Refusal to Bargain
By letter dated April 21, 2008, the Union requested
that the Respondent recognize and bargain with it as the
exclusive collective-bargaining representative of the unit.
By letter dated April 21, 2008, the Respondent notified
the Union that it would not bargain with it. We find that
the Respondent’s refusal to bargain with the Union con-
stitutes an unlawful refusal to recognize and bargain in
violation of Section 8(a)(5) and (1) of the Act.
BALLY’S ATLANTIC CITY 769
CONCLUSION OF LAW
By refusing since April 21, 2008, to recognize and bar-
gain with the Union as the exclusive collective-
bargaining representative of employees in the appropriate
unit, the Respondent has engaged in unfair labor prac-
tices affecting commerce within the meaning of Section
8(a)(5) and (1) and Section 2(6) and (7) of the Act.
REMEDY
Having found that the Respondent has violated Section
8(a)(5) and (1) of the Act, we shall order it to cease and
desist, to bargain on request with the Union, and, if an
understanding is reached, to embody the understanding
in a signed agreement.
To ensure that the employees are accorded the services
of their selected bargaining agent for the period provided
by law, we shall construe the initial period of the certifi-
cation as beginning the date the Respondent begins to
bargain in good faith with the Union. Mar-Jac Poultry
Co., 136 NLRB 785 (1962); Lamar Hotel, 140 NLRB
226, 229 (1962), enfd. 328 F.2d 600 (5th Cir. 1964), cert.
denied 379 U.S. 817 (1964); and Burnett Construction
Co., 149 NLRB 1419, 1421 (1964), enfd. 350 F.2d 57
(10th Cir. 1965).
ORDER
The National Labor Relations Board orders that the
Respondent, Bally’s Park Place, Inc. d/b/a Bally’s Atlan-
tic City, Atlantic City, New Jersey, its officers, agents,
successors, and assigns, shall
1. Cease and desist from
(a) Refusing to recognize and bargain with Interna-
tional Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agri-
cultural Implement Workers of America, AFL–CIO, as
the exclusive bargaining representative of the employees
in the bargaining unit.
(b) In any like or related manner interfering with, re-
straining, or coercing employees in the exercise of the
rights guaranteed them by Section 7 of the Act.
2. Take the following affirmative action necessary to
effectuate the policies of the Act.
(a) On request, bargain with the Union as the exclusive
representative of the employees in the following appro-
priate unit on terms and conditions of employment, and,
if an understanding is reached, embody the agreement in
a signed agreement:
All full time and regular part time dealers, keno and
simulcast employees employed by Respondent at its
Park Place and The Boardwalk, Atlantic City, New Jer-
sey facility, excluding all other employees, cashiers, pit
clerks, clerical employees, engineers, guards and su-
pervisors as defined in the Act.
(b) Within 14 days after service by the Region, post at
its Atlantic City, New Jersey facility, copies of the at-
tached notice marked “Appendix.”3 Copies of the notice,
on forms provided by the Regional Director for Region
4, after being signed by the Respondent's authorized rep-
resentative, shall be posted by the Respondent and main-
tained for 60 consecutive days in conspicuous places
including all places where notices to employees are cus-
tomarily posted. Reasonable steps shall be taken by the
Respondent to ensure that the notices are not altered,
defaced, or covered by any other material. In the event
that, during the pendency of these proceedings, the Re-
spondent has gone out of business or closed the facility
involved in these proceedings, the Respondent shall du-
plicate and mail, at its own expense, a copy of the notice
to all current employees and former employees employed
by the Respondent at any time since April 21, 2008.
(c) Within 21 days after service by the Region, file
with the Regional Director a sworn certification of a re-
sponsible official on a form provided by the Region at-
testing to the steps that the Respondent has taken to
comply.
APPENDIX
NOTICE TO EMPLOYEES
POSTED BY ORDER OF THE
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
An Agency of the United States Government
The National Labor Relations Board had found that we vio-
lated Federal labor law and has ordered us to post and obey
this notice.
FEDERAL LAW GIVES YOU THE RIGHT TO
Form, join or assist a union
Choose representatives to bargain with us on
your behalf
Act together with other employees for your bene-
fit and protection
Choose not to engage in any of these protected
activities.
WE WILL NOT refuse to recognize and bargain with In-
ternational Union, United Automobile Aerospace and
Agricultural Implement Workers of America, AFL–CIO,
as the exclusive collective-bargaining representative of
the employees in the bargaining unit.

3 If this Order is enforced by a judgment of a United States court of
appeals, the words in the notice reading “Posted by Order of the Na-
tional Labor Relations Board” shall read “Posted Pursuant to a Judg-
ment of the United States Court of Appeals Enforcing an Order of the
National Labor Relations Board.”
DECISIONS OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD770
WE WILL NOT in any like or related manner interfere
with, restrain, or coerce you in the exercise of the rights
guaranteed you by Section 7 of the Act.
WE WILL, on request, recognize and bargain with the
Union and put in writing and sign any agreement reached
on terms and conditions of employment for our employ-
ees in the following bargaining units:
All full time and regular part time dealers, keno and
simulcast employees employed by us at our Park Place
and The Boardwalk, Atlantic City, New Jersey facility,
excluding all other employees, cashiers, pit clerks,
clerical employees, engineers, guards and supervisors
as defined in the Act.
BALLY’S PARK PLACE, INC. D/B/A BALLY’S
ATLANTIC CITY