Bakery and Confectionery Wkrs. Locals 24 & 119
3 Cited authorities
Florida Power Light v. Electrical Workers
417 U.S. 790 (1974) Cited 96 timesIn Florida Power Light Co. v. IBEW, Local 641, 417 U.S. 790, 804-05, 94 S.Ct. 2737, 2744-45, 41 L.Ed.2d 477 (1974), the Supreme Court held that no § 8(b)(1)(B) violation occurs unless the disciplined conduct adversely affects the performance of his or her § 8(b)(1)(B) duties.
N.L.R.B. v. Toledo Locals Nos. 15-P 272
437 F.2d 55 (6th Cir. 1971) Cited 12 timesNo. 20297. January 27, 1971. Michael F. Messitte, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Abigail Cooley Baskir, Michael F. Messitte, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Warren D. Wolfe, Toledo, Ohio, for respondent. James F. Duggan, Chicago, Ill., for intervenor; James F. Duggan, George W. Moehlenhof, on brief; McDermott, Will Emery, Chicago, Ill., of counsel. Before
NLRB v. San Francisco Typographical U. No. 21
486 F.2d 1347 (9th Cir. 1973) Cited 4 timesIn San Francisco, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that the union violated § 8(b)(1)(B) when it disciplined a foreman who discharged an employee prior to a strike and reversed the Board's finding that disciplining three strikebreakers who were also supervisors was an unfair labor practice.