§

Automotive Proving Grounds, Inc.

139 N.L.R.B. 431 (N.L.R.B. 1962)
Automotive Proving Grounds, Inc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Whitin Mach. Works

    204 F.2d 883 (1st Cir. 1953)   Cited 57 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Whitin Machine Works, 204 F.2d 883 (1st Cir.1953), for example, an assistant supervisor in his employer's accounting department was, upon a consideration of the nature of his work, determined not to be a supervisor for purposes of litigating his discharge from employment, and, therefore, he was entitled to the protections of the National Labor Relations Act. 204 F.2d at 886.

  2. Indiana Metal Products v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    202 F.2d 613 (7th Cir. 1953)   Cited 48 times

    No. 10717. March 10, 1953. Edward J. Fahy and Shultz Fahy, Rockford, Ill., for petitioner. David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Atty. National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel and Ruth V. Reel, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before DUFFY, FINNEGAN and LINDLEY, Circuit Judges. DUFFY, Circuit Judge. This is a petition by the Indiana Metal Products Corporation

  3. Martel Mills Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    114 F.2d 624 (4th Cir. 1940)   Cited 56 times
    In Martel Mills Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 4 Cir., 114 F.2d 624, the rules by which we are to be guided in making this determination have been clearly stated by Judge Dobie. As he points out the difficulty is that they are very much simpler to state than to apply.

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Alamo White Truck Service, Inc.

    273 F.2d 238 (5th Cir. 1959)   Cited 22 times

    No. 17764. December 29, 1959. Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for appellant. Theo. F. Weiss, Clemens, Knight, Weiss Spencer, San Antonio, Tex., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, JONES and WISDOM, Circuit Judges. WISDOM, Circuit Judge. The question for decision is whether the respondent is a successor employer, for the purpose of

  5. A.E. Staley Mfg. Co. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Board

    117 F.2d 868 (7th Cir. 1941)   Cited 18 times

    No. 7301. November 14, 1940. On Request for Decree of Enforcement January 30, 1941. Rehearing Denied February 26, 1941. Petition to Review and Set Aside Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Proceeding by the A.E. Staley Manufacturing Company against the National Labor Relations Board to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board issued against the petitioner pursuant to the National Labor Relations Act. The National Labor Relations Board in its answer requested enforcement