ATLANTIC NORTHEAST TRANSPORT, INC.

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

Nov 30, 2016

364 NLRB No. 155 (N.L.R.B. 2016)

364 NLRB No. 155
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the
bound volumes of NLRB decisions. Readers are requested to notify the Ex-
ecutive Secretary, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C.
20570, of any typographical or other formal errors so that corrections can
be included in the bound volumes.
Atlantic Northeast Transport, Inc. and Nooruddin
Hanif. Case 22–CA–175081
November 30, 2016
DECISION AND ORDER
BY CHAIRMAN PEARCE AND MEMBERS MISCIMARRA
AND MCFERRAN
The General Counsel seeks a default judgment in this
case on the ground that the Respondent failed to file an
answer to the complaint. Upon a charge filed by
Nooruddin Hanif on April 28, 2016, the General Counsel
issued a complaint on July 21, 2016, against Atlantic
Northeast Transport, Inc. (the Respondent), alleging that
it has violated Section 8(a)(1) and (3) of the Act. The
Respondent failed to file an answer.
On September 20, 2016, the General Counsel filed
with the National Labor Relations Board a Motion for
Default Judgment. Thereafter, on September 21, 2016,
the Board issued an order transferring the proceeding to
the Board and a Notice to Show Cause why the motion
should not be granted. The Respondent filed no re-
sponse. The allegations in the motion are therefore un-
disputed.
On the entire record, the National Labor Relations
Board makes the following
Ruling on Motion for Default Judgment
Section 102.20 of the Board’s Rules and Regulations
provides that the allegations in a complaint shall be
deemed admitted if an answer is not filed within 14 days
from service of the complaint, unless good cause is
shown. In addition, the complaint affirmatively stated
that unless an answer was received by August 4, 2016,
the Board may find, pursuant to a motion for default
judgment, that the allegations in the complaint are true.1
Further, the undisputed allegations in the General Coun-
sel’s motion disclose that the Region, by letter dated Au-
gust 10, advised the Respondent that unless an answer
was received by August 17, 2016, a motion for default
judgment would be filed.2 No answer or request for an

1 The complaint was served on the Respondent by certified mail, re-
turn receipt requested. On August 31, 2016, the complaint was re-
turned by the Postal Service as “unclaimed.” It is well settled that a
respondent’s failure or refusal to claim certified mail or to provide for
receiving appropriate service cannot serve to defeat the purposes of the
Act. See Cray Construction Group, LLC, 341 NLRB 944, 944 fn. 5
(2004); I.C.E. Electric, Inc., 339 NLRB 247, 247 fn. 2 (2003).
2 The letter was sent by regular mail to the Respondent at its address
in Kearny, New Jersey. The letter was not returned. The failure of the
Postal Service to return documents served by regular mail indicates
extension of time to file an answer was received by that
date.
In the absence of good cause being shown for the fail-
ure to file an answer, we deem the allegations of the
complaint to be admitted as true, and we grant the Gen-
eral Counsel’s Motion for Default Judgment.3
On the entire record, the Board makes the following
FINDINGS OF FACT
I. JURISDICTION
At all material times, the Respondent, a corporation
with an office and place of business in Kearny, New Jer-
sey (the facility), has been engaged in the interstate and
intrastate transportation of freight.
During the 12-month period preceding issuance of the
complaint, the Respondent, in conducting its business
operations described above, derived gross revenue in
excess of $50,000 from the transportation of freight from
the State of New Jersey directly to points outside of the
State of New Jersey.
We find that the Respondent is an employer engaged
in commerce within the meaning of Section 2(2), (6), and
(7) of the Act.
II. ALLEGED UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES
At all material times, the following individuals held
the positions set forth opposite their respective names
and have been supervisors of the Respondent within the
meaning of Section 2(11) of the Act and agents of the
Respondent within the meaning of Section 2(13) of the
Act:
Alfred Kashinsky President and Chief Executive
Officer
Matthew Jenove Executive Vice President and
Operating Officer
At all material times, Nooruddin Hanif and others have
been employed by the Respondent as drivers, and have

actual receipt of those documents by the Respondent. Id.; Lite Flight,
Inc., 285 NLRB 649, 650 (1987), enfd. sub nom. NLRB v. Sherman,
843 F.2d 1392 (6th Cir. 1988).
3 Member Miscimarra concurs with the entry of a default judgment
in this case. However, there may be some question regarding whether
the Respondent’s correct address (used for purposes of service) is
“Kearny, New Jersey” or “South Kearny, New Jersey.” In the instant
case, it appears that both addresses result in delivery to the same physi-
cal location. Yet, because default judgment cases can give rise to ques-
tions regarding whether the proper address was used when serving the
complaint or when serving a Notice to Show Cause why a default
judgment should not be granted, Member Miscimarra believes the
Board should evaluate the development of standards that would foster
greater uniformity and certainty regarding the address that will be used
for purposes of service.
DECISIONS OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD2
been employees of the Respondent within the meaning of
Section 2(3) of the Act.
About several dates from November 2015 to April
2016, Hanif and other employees of the Respondent con-
certedly complained to the Respondent regarding the
wages, hours, and working conditions of the Respond-
ent’s employees, by questioning Matthew Jenove about
increases in certain payroll deductions, including work-
ers’ compensation insurance, liability insurance, and car-
go insurance.
About March 30, 2016, Hanif engaged in concerted ac-
tivities with other employees of the Respondent for the
purposes of their mutual aid and protection, by filing a
complaint against the Respondent with the United States
District Court located in Newark, New Jersey, contend-
ing, inter alia, that the Respondent had failed to comply
with the Truth-in-Leasing Regulations of the Motor Car-
rier Act, the New Jersey Workers’ Compensation Law,
the Wage Payment Law, and Common-Law Conversion.
About April 25, 2016, the Respondent, by Matthew
Jenove, conditioned Hanif’s continued employment on
withdrawal of the lawsuit referenced above.
About April 26, 2016, the Respondent terminated
Hanif.
The Respondent engaged in the conduct described
above because Hanif engaged in concerted activities with
other employees for the purposes of mutual aid and pro-
tection.
CONCLUSION OF LAW
By the conduct described above, the Respondent has
been interfering with, restraining, and coercing employ-
ees in the exercise of the rights guaranteed in Section 7
of the Act in violation of Section 8(a)(1) of the Act.4 The
Respondent’s unfair labor practices affect commerce
within the meaning of Section 2(6) and (7) of the Act.
REMEDY
Having found that the Respondent has engaged in cer-
tain unfair labor practices, we shall order it to cease and
desist and to take certain affirmative action designed to
effectuate the policies of the Act. Specifically, having
found that the Respondent has violated Section 8(a)(1)
by discharging Nooruddin Hanif, we shall order the Re-
spondent to offer him full reinstatement to his former job
or, if that job no longer exists, to a substantially equiva-
lent position, without prejudice to his seniority or any

4 Although the complaint additionally alleged that this conduct vio-
lated Sec. 8(a)(3) of the Act, the complaint does not allege sufficient
facts to determine whether the conduct violated Sec. 8(a)(3). In any
event, we find it unnecessary to decide whether the Respondent’s con-
duct also violated Sec. 8(a)(3), because finding this additional violation
would not materially affect the remedy.
other rights or privileges previously enjoyed, and to
make him whole for any loss of earnings and other bene-
fits suffered as a result of the discrimination against him.
Backpay shall be computed in accordance with F. W.
Woolworth Co., 90 NLRB 289 (1950), with interest at
the rate prescribed in New Horizons, 283 NLRB 1173
(1987), compounded daily as prescribed in Kentucky
River Medical Center, 356 NLRB 6 (2010). In addition,
we shall order the Respondent to compensate Hanif for
any adverse tax consequences of receiving a lump-sum
backpay award, and to file with the Regional Director for
Region 22, within 21 days of the date the amount of
backpay is fixed, either by agreement or Board order, a
report allocating the backpay awards to the appropriate
calendar years for Hanif. AdvoServ of New Jersey, Inc.,
363 NLRB No. 143 (2016).
In accordance with our recent decision in King Soop-
ers, Inc., 364 NLRB No. 93 (2016), we shall also order
the Respondent to compensate Hanif for his search-for-
work and interim employment expenses regardless of
whether those expenses exceed interim earnings. Search-
for-work and interim employment expenses shall be cal-
culated separately from taxable net backpay, with interest
at the rate prescribed in New Horizons, supra, com-
pounded daily as prescribed in Kentucky River Medical
Center, supra.5
Further, the Respondent shall be required to remove
from its files any and all references to Hanif’s unlawful
discharge, and to notify him in writing that this has been
done and that the discharge will not be used against him
in any way.
ORDER
The National Labor Relations Board orders that the
Respondent, Atlantic Northeast Transport, Inc., Kearny,
New Jersey, its officers, agents, successors, and assigns
shall
1. Cease and desist from
(a) Threatening employees by telling them that their
continued employment is conditioned on their ceasing to
engage in protected concerted activities, such as filing a
lawsuit for the purposes of employees’ mutual aid and
protection.
(b) Discharging employees because they engage in
protected concerted activities, including activities such as
filing a lawsuit for the purposes of employees’ mutual
aid and protection.

5 For the reasons stated in his separate opinion in King Soopers, 364
NLRB No. 93, slip op. at 9–16, Member Miscimarra would adhere to
the Board’s former approach, treating search-for-work and interim
employment expenses as an offset against interim earnings.
ATLANTIC NORTHEAST TRANSPORT, INC. 3
(c) In any like or related manner interfering with, re-
straining, or coercing employees in the exercise of the
rights guaranteed them by Section 7 of the Act.
2. Take the following affirmative action necessary to
effectuate the policies of the Act.
(a) Within 14 days from the date of this Order, offer
Nooruddin Hanif full reinstatement to his former job or,
if that job no longer exists, to a substantially equivalent
position, without prejudice to his seniority or any other
rights or privileges previously enjoyed.
(b) Make Nooruddin Hanif whole for any loss of earn-
ings and other benefits suffered as a result of his unlaw-
ful discharge, in the manner set forth in the remedy sec-
tion of this decision.
(c) Within 14 days from the date of this Order, re-
move from its files any references to the unlawful dis-
charge of Nooruddin Hanif, and within 3 days thereafter,
notify him in writing that this has been done and that the
discharge will not be used against him in any way.
(d) Compensate Nooruddin Hanif for the adverse tax
consequences, if any, of receiving a lump-sum backpay
award, and file with the Regional Director for Region 22,
within 21 days of the date the amount of backpay is
fixed, either by agreement or Board order, a report allo-
cating the backpay award to the appropriate calendar
year.
(e) Preserve and, within 14 days of a request, or such
additional time as the Regional Director may allow for
good cause shown, provide at a reasonable place desig-
nated by the Board or its agents, all payroll records, so-
cial security payment records, timecards, personnel rec-
ords and reports, and all other records, including an elec-
tronic copy of such records if stored in electronic form,
necessary to analyze the amount of backpay due under
the terms of this Order.
(f) Within 14 days after service by the Region, post at
its facility in Kearny, New Jersey, copies of the attached
notice marked “Appendix.”6 Copies of the notice, on
forms provided by the Regional Director for Region 22,
after being signed by the Respondent’s authorized repre-
sentative, shall be posted by the Respondent and main-
tained for 60 consecutive days in conspicuous places,
including all places where notices to employees are cus-
tomarily posted. In addition to physical posting of paper
notices, notices shall be distributed electronically, such
as by email, posting on an intranet or an internet site,
and/or other electronic means, if the Respondent custom-

6 If this Order is enforced by a judgment of a United States court of
appeals, the words in the notice reading “Posted by Order of the Na-
tional Labor Relations Board” shall read “Posted Pursuant to a Judg-
ment of the United States Court of Appeals Enforcing an Order of the
National Labor Relations Board.”
arily communicates with its employees by such means.
Reasonable steps shall be taken by the Respondent to
ensure that the notices are not altered, defaced, or cov-
ered by any other material. If the Respondent has gone
out of business or closed the facilities involved in these
proceedings, the Respondent shall duplicate and mail, at
its own expense, a copy of the notice to all current em-
ployees and former employees employed by the Re-
spondent at any time since April 25, 2016.
(g) Within 21 days after service by the Region, file
with the Regional Director for Region 22 a sworn certifi-
cation of a responsible official on a form provided by the
Region attesting to the steps that the Respondent has
taken to comply.
Dated, Washington, D.C. November 30, 2016
______________________________________
Mark Gaston Pearce, Chairman
______________________________________
Philip A. Miscimarra Member
______________________________________
Lauren McFerran, Member
(SEAL) NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
APPENDIX
Notice To Employees
Posted by Order of the
National Labor Relations Board
An Agency of the United States Government
The National Labor Relations Board has found that we vio-
lated Federal labor law and has ordered us to post and obey
this notice.
FEDERAL LAW GIVES YOU THE RIGHT TO
Form, join, or assist a union
Choose representatives to bargain with us on
your behalf
Act together with other employees for your bene-
fit and protection
Choose not to engage in any of these protected
activities.
WE WILL NOT threaten you by telling you that your
continued employment is conditioned on your ceasing to
engage in protected concerted activities, such as filing a
DECISIONS OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD4
lawsuit for the purposes of employees’ mutual aid and
protection.
WE WILL NOT discharge you because you have en-
gaged in protected concerted activities, such as filing a
lawsuit for the purposes of employees’ mutual aid and
protection.
WE WILL NOT in any like or related manner interfere
with, restrain, or coerce you in the exercise of the rights
listed above.
WE WILL, within 14 days from the date of this Order,
offer Nooruddin Hanif full reinstatement to his former
job or, if that job no longer exists, to a substantially
equivalent position, without prejudice to his seniority or
any other rights or privileges previously enjoyed.
WE WILL make Nooruddin Hanif whole for any loss of
earnings and other benefits resulting from our unlawful
conduct, less any net interim earnings, plus interest, plus
reasonable search-for-work and interim employment
expenses.
WE WILL, within 14 days from the date of the Board’s
Order, remove from our files any references to the un-
lawful discharge of Nooruddin Hanif, and WE WILL,
within 3 days thereafter, notify him in writing that this
has been done and that the discharge will not be used
against him in any way.
WE WILL compensate Nooruddin Hanif for the adverse
tax consequences, if any, of receiving a lump-sum back-
pay award, and WE WILL file with the Regional Director
for Region 22, within 21 days from the date the amount
of backpay is fixed, either by agreement or Board order,
a report allocating the backpay award to the appropriate
calendar year.
ATLANTIC NORTHEAST TRANSPORT, INC.
The Board’s decision can be found at
www.nlrb.gov/case/22-CA-175081 or by using the QR code
below. Alternatively, you can obtain a copy of the decision
from the Executive Secretary, National Labor Relations
Board, 1015 Half Street, S.E., Washington, D.C. 20570, or
by calling (202) 273-1940.