Atkinson Dredging Co.

5 Cited authorities

Pittsburgh Glass Co. v. Board
313 U.S. 146 (1941) Cited 294 times
In Pittsburgh Glass, the Court held that it was not a denial of due process for the Board to refuse to consider evidence relating to the certification issue when petitioner first sought to introduce such evidence at the unfair labor practice hearing.
National Lbr. Rel. Bd. v. Botany Worsted Mills
133 F.2d 876 (3d Cir. 1943) Cited 42 times
Nos. 8132, 8133. Argued November 18, 1942. Decided January 18, 1943. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce the Board's order against the Botany Worsted Mills, and petition by the Botany Worsted Mills to set aside the Board's order. The Botany Worsted Mills moved to consolidate the petitions and for leave to adduce additional evidence. Petition of Board granted with modification in accordance with opinion, and petition of the respondent
National Labor Rel. Board v. W. Kentucky Coal
152 F.2d 198 (6th Cir. 1945) Cited 19 times
No. 9936. December 6, 1945. Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board against West Kentucky Coal Company. Order modified, and enforced, as modified. Owsley Vose, of Washington, D.C. (David A. Morse, and Malcolm F. Halliday, A. Norman Somers, and Owsley Vose, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. James G. Wheeler, of Paducah, Ky. (James G. Wheeler, of Paducah, Ky., and M.K
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. American Steel Buck
227 F.2d 927 (2d Cir. 1955) Cited 7 times
No. 50, Docket 23577. Argued October 13, 1955. Decided December 1, 1955. Theophil C. Kammholz, David P. Findling, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Elizabeth W. Weston and Rose Mary Filipowicz, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Raphael, Searles, Levin Vischi, New York City (Sidney O. Raphael, New York City, of counsel), for respondent. Before FRANK, HINCKS and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. As the facts are fully stated in the Board's decision, reported in 110 N.L.R.B. No. 265, we shall not repeat them
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,091 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"

Atkinson Dredging Co.

5 Cited authorities

Pittsburgh Glass Co. v. Board

In Pittsburgh Glass, the Court held that it was not a denial of due process for the Board to refuse to consider evidence relating to the certification issue when petitioner first sought to introduce such evidence at the unfair labor practice hearing.

National Lbr. Rel. Bd. v. Botany Worsted Mills

National Labor Rel. Board v. W. Kentucky Coal

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. American Steel Buck

Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"