ยง

American Newspaper Guild, AFL-CIO, Etc.

153 N.L.R.B. 744 (N.L.R.B. 1965)
American Newspaper Guild, AFL-CIO, Etc.

13 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council

    341 U.S. 675 (1951)   Cited 494 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce

  2. Electrical Workers v. Labor Board

    366 U.S. 667 (1961)   Cited 186 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union may picket a secondary employer only when the primary employer is at the job site

  3. Electrical Workers v. Labor Board

    341 U.S. 694 (1951)   Cited 246 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the prohibition of picketing in furtherance of unlawful objectives is not an abridgement of free speech

  4. Labor Board v. Rice Milling Co.

    341 U.S. 665 (1951)   Cited 126 times
    Noting that section 8(b) was intended to preserve "the right of labor organizations to bring pressure to bear on offending employers in primary labor disputes"

  5. Steelworkers v. Labor Board

    376 U.S. 492 (1964)   Cited 75 times
    Stating that section 8(b) prohibits labor unions from engaging in "secondary boycotting" by "exert[ing] pressure on an employer not involved in the relevant labor dispute ('the secondary employer') in order to obtain a favorable result in the ongoing labor dispute with another employer ('the primary employer')"

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bus. Mach

    228 F.2d 553 (2d Cir. 1955)   Cited 67 times
    In National Labor Relations Bd. v. Business Mach. etc., CIO (228 F.2d 553) the Circuit Court of Appeals for this circuit declared (p. 559) that "The only thing proscribed by ยง 8(b)(4) is inducement or encouragement of the employees of the customers".

  7. Seafarers International Un., Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    265 F.2d 585 (D.C. Cir. 1959)   Cited 46 times

    No. 14373. Argued November 4, 1958. Decided January 29, 1959. Mr. C. Paul Barker, New Orleans, La., of the bar of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Messrs. Ray R. Murdock, Washington, D.C., and Seymour W. Miller, Brooklyn, N.Y., were on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Norton J. Come, Deputy Asst. Gen. Counsel, with whom Mr. Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Mr. Thomas J. McDermott, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, and Mr. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel

  8. Superior Derrick Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    273 F.2d 891 (5th Cir. 1960)   Cited 37 times

    Nos. 17619, 17512. January 21, 1960. C. Paul Barker, Dodd, Hirsch, Barker Meunier, New Orleans, La., Seymour W. Miller, Brooklyn, N.Y., of counsel, for Seafarers' International Union of North America, and others. Bernard Marcus, Deutsch, Kerrigan Stiles, New Orleans, La., Eberhard P. Deutsch, New Orleans, La., of counsel, for Superior Derrick Corp. Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Norton

  9. Retail Fruit Veg. Clerks U. v. N.L.R.B

    249 F.2d 591 (9th Cir. 1957)   Cited 39 times

    No. 15298. November 8, 1957. Carroll, Davis, Burdick, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Stephen Leonard, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Duane Beeson, Norton J. Come, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before DENMAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and BONE and FEE, Circuit Judges. BONE, Circuit Judge. Petitioners bring the instant proceeding to this Court for review and seek an order setting aside an order of the National

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Milk Drivers Dairy Emp. L. U. 584

    341 F.2d 29 (2d Cir. 1965)   Cited 18 times

    No. 288, Docket 29130. Argued January 12, 1965. Decided January 26, 1965. Melvin J. Welles, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Linda R. Sher, Attorney, NLRB, on the brief), for petitioner. Bruce H. Simon, New York City (Robert S. Savelson, New York City, of counsel, and Cohen Weiss, New York City, on the brief), for respondent. Before SMITH, KAUFMAN and ANDERSON