Alva Allen Industries, Inc.

13 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Insurance Agents

    361 U.S. 477 (1960)   Cited 324 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, subject to the duty to bargain in good faith, "parties should have wide latitude in their negotiations"
  2. Brooks v. Labor Board

    348 U.S. 96 (1954)   Cited 300 times
    Holding that an employer has a duty to bargain in good faith for one year beginning on the date of certification of the bargaining representative by the Board
  3. Labor Board v. American Ins. Co.

    343 U.S. 395 (1952)   Cited 269 times
    Holding the degree of discretion in a CBA "is an issue for determination across the bargaining table, not by the Board"
  4. Wallace Corp. v. Labor Board

    323 U.S. 248 (1944)   Cited 162 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that corporation committed unfair labor practice
  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Reed Prince MFG

    205 F.2d 131 (1st Cir. 1953)   Cited 118 times
    In Reed Prince, supra, this court affirmed the Board's finding of refusal to bargain in good faith only "[a]fter an attentive review of the entire record of the bargaining negotiations."
  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Whittier Mills Co.

    111 F.2d 474 (5th Cir. 1940)   Cited 67 times
    Interpreting Virginian Railway's holding as “[w]here with fair opportunity to all members of the unit to vote, a majority do vote, they are, so to speak, a quorum to settle the matter, and the majority of that quorum binds those not voting, and suffices to select the bargaining representative of the unit”
  7. Globe Cotton Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    103 F.2d 91 (5th Cir. 1939)   Cited 39 times
    In Globe Cotton Mills v. National Labor Relations Board, 5 Cir., 103 F.2d 91, 94, the court said: "there is a duty on both sides * * * to enter into discussion with an open and fair mind, and a sincere purpose to find a basis of agreement touching wages and hours and conditions of labor, and if found to embody it in a contract as specific as possible, which shall stand as a mutual guaranty of conduct, and as a guide for the adjustment of grievances."
  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Hamilton

    220 F.2d 492 (10th Cir. 1955)   Cited 10 times

    No. 4953. March 22, 1955. Rehearing Denied May 5, 1955. Nancy M. Sherman, Washington, D.C. (Elizabeth W. Weston, George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Edward E. Soule, Oklahoma City, Okla. (Lytle, Johnson Soule, Oklahoma City, Okla., on the brief), for respondents. Lee B. Thompson, Oklahoma City, Okla. (Roy L. Sullivan and McInnis, Cantrell, Thompson Sullivan, Oklahoma

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Reliance Clay Prod

    245 F.2d 599 (5th Cir. 1957)   Cited 4 times

    No. 16449. June 10, 1957. Samuel M. Singer, Atty., N.L.R.B., Stephen Leonard, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. James R. Rodgers, Turner, Rodgers, Winn, Scurlock Terry, Dallas, Tex., for respondent. Before BORAH, RIVES and BROWN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. In this petition for enforcement of the Board's order, 115 N.L.R.B. 1736, finding the Employer in violation of Section

  10. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Athens Mfg. Co

    161 F.2d 8 (Conn. Cir. Ct. 1947)   Cited 12 times

    No. 11852. May 7, 1947. Rehearing Denied June 27, 1947. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of an order against Athens Manufacturing Company. Order enforced in accordance with opinion. Gerhard P. Van Arkel, General Counsel, N.L.R.B., and A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, N.L.R.B., both of Washington, D.C., and Paul E. Kuelthau, Regional Atty., N.L.R.B., of Atlanta, Ga., for petitioner. Murphey Candler, Jr., of Decatur, Ga., and Abit Nix, of Athens, Ga., for respondent

  11. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,091 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"