Allstate Insurance Co.

11 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bell Aerospace Co.

    416 U.S. 267 (1974)   Cited 759 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an agency is "not precluded from announcing new principles in an adjudicative proceeding"
  2. De Jesus v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

    87 F.3d 65 (2d Cir. 1996)   Cited 489 times
    Holding that it is appropriate to deny leave to amend "when a party has been given ample prior opportunity to allege a claim"
  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Yeshiva University

    444 U.S. 672 (1980)   Cited 183 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that all faculty members are managers for purposes of federal labor law even though they lack any legal instruments of control
  4. Labor Board v. Insurance Agents

    361 U.S. 477 (1960)   Cited 324 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, subject to the duty to bargain in good faith, "parties should have wide latitude in their negotiations"
  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Natural Gas Utility District

    402 U.S. 600 (1971)   Cited 187 times   32 Legal Analyses
    Holding utility district was political subdivision under that standard
  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Health Care & Retirement Corp. of America

    511 U.S. 571 (1994)   Cited 97 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the Board's test is inconsistent with both the statutory language and th[e] Court's precedents"
  7. Deus v. Allstate Insurance

    15 F.3d 506 (5th Cir. 1994)   Cited 161 times
    Holding that intervenors don't have standing to seek document unsealing
  8. Compuware Corporation v. National Relations

    134 F.3d 1285 (6th Cir. 1998)   Cited 12 times
    Holding that no specific authorization was needed to show concerted activity where an employee had "almost from the beginning of his employment . . . discussed . . . problems with other employees" and made objections on behalf of other employees for their mutual aid or protection
  9. Deaton Truck Line, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    337 F.2d 697 (5th Cir. 1964)   Cited 18 times

    Nos. 20791-21332. October 2, 1964. Rehearings Denied December 21, 1964. Mark L. Taliaferro, C.V. Stelzenmuller, Birmingham, Ala. (Moore, Thomas, Taliaferro, Forman Burr, Birmingham, Ala., of counsel), for petitioner, Deaton Truck Line, Inc. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., Washington, D.C., for respondent. L.N.D. Wells, Jr., David R. Richards, Dallas, Tex., for Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen Helpers, Local Union

  10. Intern'l. Un. of Uni. Brewery, v. N.L.R.B

    298 F.2d 297 (D.C. Cir. 1961)   Cited 20 times

    Nos. 15759, 15929, 15988. Argued September 19, 1961. Decided November 9, 1961. Certiorari Denied April 9, 1962. See 82 S.Ct. 875. Mr. James C. Paradise, Cincinnati, Ohio, with whom Mr. Mozart G. Ratner, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioner in No. 15759. Mr. Lawrence J. Molony, New Orleans, La., of the bar of the Supreme Ct. of Louisiana, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Messrs. Rocco C. Siciliano and Charles A. Hobbs, Washington, D.C., were on the brief for respondent

  11. Section 158 - Unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 158   Cited 10,317 times   84 Legal Analyses
    Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355