Allied Maintenance Corp.

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

Dec 12, 1974

215 N.L.R.B. 535 (N.L.R.B. 1974)

ALLIED SERVICE COMPANY 535
-Allied Service Company of Texas, Inc., a Subsidiary of
Allied Maintenance Corporation andTeamsters Lo-
cal Union No . 19--Airline Division, affiliated with
International Association of Teamsters , Chauffeurs,
Warehousemen and Helpers of America. Case
16-RC-6621
December 12, 1974
DECISION ON REVIEW AND ORDER
BY CHAIRMAN MILLER AND MEMBERS FANNING AND
KENNEDY
On August 15, 1974, the Acting Regional Director
for Region 16 issued a Decision and Direction of
Election' in the above-entitled proceeding. Thereafter,
in accordance with Section 102.67 of the National La-
bor Relations Board Rules and Regulations, Series 8,
as amended, the Employer and the Intervenor2 filed
timely requests for review of the Acting Regional
Director's decision, contending that the Acting Re-
gional Director erred in failing to find that their con-
tracts constituted a bar to the instant petition, as re-
quired by Appalachian Shale Products Co., 121 NLRB
1160 (1958).
By telegraphic order dated September 13, 1974, the
National Labor Relations Board granted the requests
for review and stayed the election pending decision on
review.
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3(b) of the
National Labor Relations Act, as amended, the Na-
tional Labor Relations Board has delegated its au-
thority in this proceeding to a three-member panel.
The Board has considered the entire record in this
case with respect to the issues under review and makes
the following findings:
The Employer is engaged to the business of providing
skycap service at various airport facilities throughout
the country, including the Dallas-Fort Worth Regional
Airport involved herein. Prior to the opening of the
latter airport, the Employer provided similar service at
the Love Field Airport in Dallas where its employees
were represented for approximately 15 years by the
United Transportation Service Employees,
AFL-CIO (UTSE), until that labor organization's
merger with Intervenor herein in 1972 when the Inter-
venor assumed UTSE's representation rights with re-
spect to employees of the Employer at various locations
throughout the country.
i The appropriate unit is "All skycaps and skycap captains of the Em-
ployer at the Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Airport, Texas, excluding office
clerical employees, guards and supervisors as defined by the Act "
2 Allied Service Division of Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steam-
ship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employees,
AFL-CIO
The basic contractual agreement, in evidence, be-
tween UTSE and the Employer covering the skycaps at
Love Field in Dallas, was effective from -November 2,
1971, until November 2, 1972, and contained 18 sepa-
rate articles covering terms and conditions of employ-
ment traditionally found in a collective-bargaining
agreements.' Also in evidence is a "Memorandum of
Agreement" dated September 21, * 1972, signed by the
Employer and the Intervenor which provided that the
"attached agreement shall renew and continue in full
force and effect from November 3, 1972, through June
30, 1973" and that either party had the right to
renegotiate articles therein upon proper notification.
The record testimony discloses that the "attached
agreement" was the basic agreement described above.
A document entitled "Recognition of Successorship
and Assumption of Agreement," dated December 1,
1972, and signed by the Employer and the Intervenor
set out the Employer's recognition of the Intervenor as
successor to UTSE as the bargaining agent of Em-
ployer's employees at its various locations including
"Dallas, Texas" and further acknowledged the full as-
sumption of said agreement by the Intervenor herein.
This recognition document was followed by a signed
"Memorandum of Agreement," dated March 21, 1973,
covering the skycap employees at Love Field, Dallas,
Texas. This letter agreement had an effective term of 1
year running from November 2, 1972, through Novem-
ber 1, 1973; provided for health and welfare as well as
pension contributions by the Employer; and expressly
stated "All other terms and conditions of the previous
Agreement will remain unchanged."
In anticipation of the closing of Love Field, the Em-
ployer and Intervenor concluded a written agreement,
accepted by the Intervenor on November 1, 1973,
which extended the above-mentioned Memorandum of
Agreement "to and including the date of closing of
Love Field," and also provided:
2. Upon the closing of Love Field and the opening
of the Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Airport, all
of the covered employees who work at Love
Field, shall be transfered to the Dallas-Fort
Worth Regional Airport to the extent that the
employer has jobs available.
3. At such time as the new Dallas-Fort Worth
Regional Airport is opened, we shall negotiate
a renewal of the Collective Bargaining Agree-
ment between Allied and BRAC [Intervenor]
covering the Skycaps and Skycap Captains em-
ployed by the employer which shall be effective
3 As found by the Acting Regional Director, these articles included,
among others, union recognition, hours of work, rates of pay, vacations,
seniority, reduction in force, holidays, no strike, no lockout, union dues and
checkoff, grievance procedure , and management rights
215 NLRB No. 102
536 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
from the date of opening of the new regional
airport.
In March 1974, after the Dallas-Fort Worth Re-
gional Airport had become operational, bargaining ses-
sions took place in Dallas between representatives of
the Employer and the Intervenor. Following those bar-
gaining sessions , Employer forwarded to Intervenor a
two-page document with a covering letter dated April
3, 1974, stating in part, "Enclosed is the Local Supple-
ment for the Dallas Skycaps, Dallas, Texas. If there are
any problems or questions, please call." The two-page
"Local Supplement," which the Acting Regional Di-
rector found was executed by the Intervenor after mak-
ing some modifications on the first page and received
by the Employer prior to the filing of the petition,
contains the names of the parties with the "(Dallas
Skycaps)" under the Intervenor's name. It provides for
a 3-year term effective January 13, 1974; wage rates for
skycaps and skycap captains as'of March 20, 1974, and
January 13, 1975; health and welfare contributions;
holidays; vacations; strike layoff, and other matters.
The record testimony reveals the modifications made
by Intervenor were discussed by telephone between the
two signators to the agreement and that the Employer
has implemented the terms of the agreement.
Contrary to the Acting Regional Director, we find
on the record as a whole that the Local Supplement
which was effective for 3 years from January 13, 1974,
is a bar to the petition. While this supplement in effect
describes the location of the unit by use of the term
"Dallas Skycaps," we think that in light of the anteced-
ent chain of negotiations and agreements it is clear
that the term unmistakably referred to the skycaps at
the Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Airport. Thus, for
many years before the opening of the regional airport,
the parties agreed to, and did, bargain for an orderly
transition of their contractual relationship from Love
Field to the regional airport. This bargaining cul-
minated in the execution . of the Local Supplement
which has been implemented by both parties.
We further find that the Local Supplement contains
sufficient substantive terms and conditions of employ-
ment to insure industrial stability. Accordingly, said
agreement bars processing the instant petition and we
shall therefore dismiss it.
ORDER
It is hereby ordered that the petition filed herein be,
and it hereby is, dismissed.