§
Alamo Cement Co.

14 Cited authorities

  1. Sure-Tan, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    467 U.S. 883 (1984)   Cited 416 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that NLRB could order reinstatement with back pay as a remedy for constructive discharge

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J. H. Rutter-Rex Manufacturing Co.

    396 U.S. 258 (1969)   Cited 184 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB "is not required to place the consequences of its own delay, even if inordinate, upon wronged employees to the benefit of wrongdoing employers."

  3. Carpenters Local v. Labor Board

    365 U.S. 651 (1961)   Cited 84 times
    Noting Board's authority is remedial, not punitive

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Mastro Plastics Corporation

    354 F.2d 170 (2d Cir. 1965)   Cited 96 times
    In Mastro, the relatives of two deceased discriminatees had testified as to the discriminatees' diligent searches for work.

  5. Knuth v. Erie-Crawford Dairy Coop. Association

    395 F.2d 420 (3d Cir. 1968)   Cited 84 times
    In Knuth v. Erie-Crawford Dairy Coop. Association, 395 F.2d 420 (3d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 410 U.S. 913, 93 S.Ct. 966, 35 L.Ed.2d 278 (1973), the district court dismissed a federal antitrust count and a pendent state unfair competition claim.

  6. Int'l Ladies' Garment Workers U. v. N.L.R.B

    463 F.2d 907 (D.C. Cir. 1972)   Cited 60 times
    In Ladies' Garment Workers, the Second Circuit stated that "no genuine bargaining... can be conducted where the decision has already been made and implemented."

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc.

    311 F.2d 447 (8th Cir. 1963)   Cited 71 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc., 311 F.2d 447, 454 (C.A. 8), it is said that "in a back pay proceeding the burden is upon the General Counsel to show the gross amounts of back pay due.

  8. Nabors v. N.L.R.B

    323 F.2d 686 (5th Cir. 1963)   Cited 59 times
    Holding that NLRB acts in public capacity and “[t]he fact that these proceedings operate to confer an incidental benefit on private persons does not detract from this public purpose”

  9. Arrow Automotive Industries, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    853 F.2d 223 (4th Cir. 1988)   Cited 10 times
    In Arrow, the company's actions, "however they might be labeled, were not a subject of mandatory bargaining when examined in light of the analysis set forth by the Supreme Court."

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Drapery Manufacturing Co.

    425 F.2d 1026 (8th Cir. 1970)   Cited 19 times
    Distinguishing Fibreboard and Ozark Trailers, the court holds that the decision of a parent company to close its subsidiary involved a major shift in investment capital, hence the decision to close not a mandatory bargaining subject under Fibreboard

  11. Section 6621 - Determination of rate of interest

    26 U.S.C. § 6621   Cited 1,874 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Applying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions