§

ACE Masonry, Inc., d/b/a ACE Unlimited and Bella Masonry LLC, alter egos and Bella Furniture Solutio

363 NLRB No. 181 (N.L.R.B. 2016)
ACE Masonry, Inc., d/b/a ACE Unlimited and Bella Masonry LLC, alter egos and Bella Furniture Solutio

13 Cited authorities

  1. Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills

    353 U.S. 448 (1957)   Cited 2,323 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that § 301 expresses a federal policy in favor of the enforceability of labor contracts

  2. Wall Street Associates v. Brodsky

    257 A.D.2d 526 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)   Cited 354 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Including as a badge of fraud "a questionable transfer not in the usual course of business"

  3. U.S. v. McCombs

    30 F.3d 310 (2d Cir. 1994)   Cited 276 times
    Holding that where government ran afoul of notice requirements of federal statute governing priority between federal tax liens and interests of subsequent purchasers, to deny subsequent holder of security interest priority over tax lien would allow government to "leap frog" the interests vested in two prior mortgage liens and would represent "a classic example of unjust enrichment"

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Greater Kansas City Roofing

    2 F.3d 1047 (10th Cir. 1993)   Cited 97 times
    Holding it was error to hold sole shareholder personally liable for judgment against corporation she controlled because that there was no evidence to suggest her disregard for many corporate formalities constituted fraud or was done to cause the company to be less able to pay a judgment

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fullerton Transfer & Storage Ltd.

    910 F.2d 331 (6th Cir. 1990)   Cited 90 times
    Articulating the alter-ego standard as “whether the two enterprises have substantially identical management, business purpose, operation, equipment, customers, supervision and ownership”

  6. Firstmark Cap. Corp. v. Hempel Financial Corp.

    859 F.2d 92 (9th Cir. 1988)   Cited 66 times
    In Firstmark Capital, a plaintiff attempted to reach the assets of the wife of the owner of a corporation in order to satisfy a judgment against the corporation.

  7. In re Strangie

    192 F.3d 192 (1st Cir. 1999)   Cited 41 times

    No. 98-2033 Heard August 2, 1999 Decided September 30, 1999 APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. William G. Young, U.S. District Judge] Richard W. Gannett, with whom Gannett Associates was on brief for appellant. John F. Davis, with whom Boudreau, Mitchell Davis was on brief for appellee. Before Selya, Circuit Judge, Cyr, Senior Circuit Judge, and Lipez, Circuit Judge. CYR, Senior Circuit Judge. Smith Barney, Inc. ("Smith Barney") challenges a district

  8. United States v. Schippers

    982 F. Supp. 2d 948 (S.D. Iowa 2013)   Cited 20 times
    Holding that a valid divorce decree "would have no effect on this Court's determination that the transfers [in the decree] were invalid under federal law"

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Martin Arsham Sewing Co.

    873 F.2d 884 (6th Cir. 1989)   Cited 51 times
    Noting that "[t]o allow a creditor of the bankrupt to pursue his remedy against third parties on a fraudulent transfer theory would undermine the Bankruptcy Code policy of equitable distribution by allowing the creditor `to push its way to the front of the line of creditors

  10. Bufco Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    147 F.3d 964 (D.C. Cir. 1998)   Cited 20 times
    Finding two corporations to be alter egos despite the allegation that defendants conducted and recorded all corporate meetings

  11. Section 3304 - Transfer fraudulent as to a debt to the United States

    28 U.S.C. § 3304   Cited 278 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Defining actual fraudulent transfers