2000-2020 Davidson Avenue Realty Corp.

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

Jun 21, 2001

334 N.L.R.B. 46 (N.L.R.B. 2001)

334 NLRB No. 46
1
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the
bound volumes of NLRB decisions. Readers are requested to notify the Ex-
ecutive Secretary, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C.
20570, of any typographical or other formal errors so that corrections can
be included in the bound volumes.
2000-2020 Davidson Avenue Realty Corporation and
Service Employees International Union, Local
32E, AFL–CIO. Case 2–CA–33097
June 21, 2001
DECISION AND ORDER
BY CHAIRMAN HURTGEN AND MEMBERS LIEBMAN
AND WALSH
Upon a charge filed on June 26, 2000, by the Service
Employees International Union, Local 32E, AFL–CIO,
the General Counsel of the National Labor Relations
Board issued a complaint on January 26, 2001, against
2000-2020 Davidson Avenue Realty Corporation, the
Respondent, alleging that it has violated Section 8(a)(5)
and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act. Although
properly served with copies of the charge and complaint,
the Respondent failed to file an answer.
On May 10, 2001, the General Counsel filed a Motion
for Summary Judgment with the Board. On May 11, the
Board issued an order transferring the proceeding to the
Board and a Notice to Show Cause why the motion
should not be granted. The Respondent filed no re-
sponse. The allegations in the motion are therefore un-
disputed.
The National Labor Relations Board has delegated its
authority in this proceeding to a three-member panel.
Ruling on Motion for Summary Judgment
Sections 102.20 and 102.21 of the Board’s Rules and
Regulations provide that the allegations in the complaint
shall be deemed admitted if an answer is not filed within
14 days from service of the complaint, unless good cause
is shown. In addition, the complaint affirmatively notes
that unless an answer is filed within 14 days of service,
all the allegations in the complaint will be considered
admitted. Further, the undisputed allegations in the Peti-
tion for Summary Judgment disclose that the Region, by
letter dated April 5, 2001, notified the Respondent that
unless an answer were received by April 12, 2001, a Mo-
tion for Summary Judgment would be filed.
In the absence of good cause being shown for the fail-
ure to file a timely answer, we grant the General Coun-
sel’s Motion for Summary Judgment.
On the entire record, the Board makes the following
FINDINGS OF FACT
I. JURISDICTION
At all material times, the Respondent, a corporation
with an office and place of business in Bronx, New York,
has owned and operated various buildings in the New
York Metropolitan area, including residential apartment
buildings located at 2000-2020 Davidson Avenue,
Bronx, New York. In the calendar year preceding the
issuance of the complaint, the Respondent, in the course
and conduct of its business operations, derived gross
revenue in excess of $500,000, and purchased and re-
ceived at its buildings located within the State of New
York goods, materials, and supplies valued in excess of
$5000 directly from businesses located outside the State
of New York. We find that the Respondent is an em-
ployer engaged in commerce within the meaning of Sec-
tion 2(2), (6), and (7) of the Act and that the Union is a
labor organization within the meaning of Section 2(5) of
the Act.
II. ALLEGED UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES
At all material times, Steve Green has been a supervi-
sor of the Respondent within the meaning of Section
2(11) of the Act, and an agent acting on its behalf.
In or about March 2000, the Respondent purchased the
residential apartment buildings located at 2000, 2012,
2016, and 2020 Davidson Avenue, Bronx, New York
(the Building) from JMG Management, Inc. (JMG) and
since then has continued to operate the Building in basi-
cally unchanged form, and employed as a majority of its
employees individuals who were previously employees
of JMG. Based on these facts, the Respondent has con-
tinued as the employing entity and is a successor to
JMG. 1
The following employees constitute a unit appropriate
for the purpose of collective bargaining within the mean-
ing of Section 9(b) of the Act:

All employees engaged in serv icing, maintaining,
cleaning and performing work of allied nature at 2000-
12-16-20 Davidson Avenue, Bronx, New York, ex-
cluding all other employees, office clerical employees,
professional employees, and guards and supervisors as
defined in the Act.

For many years, and at all times material here, the Un-
ion has been the designated exclusive collective-
bargaining representative of the unit and has been recog-
nized as the representative by prior owners of the Build-
ing, including JMG. This recognition has been embodied
in successive collective-bargaining agreements, the most

1 See NLRB v. Burns Security Services, 406 U.S. 272 (1972).
DECISIONS OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD 2
recent of which was effective from September 1, 1997,
through September 1, 2000.
At all material times until about March 2000, based on
Section 9(a) of the Act, the Union had been the exclusive
collective-bargaining representative of the unit employ-
ees employed by JMG. At all times since March 2000,
based on Section 9(a) of the Act, the Union has been the
exclusive collective-bargaining representative of the Re-
spondent’s unit employees.
On or about May 3 and again on May 31, 2000, by let-
ter, the Union requested that the Respondent meet and
bargain with the Union concerning wages, hours, and
other terms and conditions of employment for unit em-
ployees. At all times since May 3, 2000, the Respondent
has failed and refused to respond to the Union’s letters
and has failed and refused to recognize and bargain with
the Union as the exclusive collective-bargaining repre-
sentative of the unit employees.
CONCLUSION OF LAW
By the acts and conduct des cribed above, the Respon-
dent has failed and refused to bargain collectively and in
good faith with the Union as the exclusive collective-
bargaining representative of its employees, and has
thereby engaged in unfair labor practices affecting com-
merce within the meaning of Section 8(a)(5) and (1) and
Section 2(6) and (7) of the Act.
REMEDY
Having found that the Respondent has engaged in cer-
tain unfair labor practices, we shall order it to cease and
desist and to take certain affirmative action designed to
effectuate the policies of the Act. Specifically, having
found that the Respondent has failed and refused to bar-
gain collectively and in good faith with the Union as the
exclusive collective-bargaining representative of its em-
ployees, we shall order the Respondent, on request, to
bargain with the Service Employees International Union,
Local 32E, AFL–CIO and, if an agreement is reached, to
embody the understanding in a signed agreement.
ORDER
The National Labor Relations Board orders that the
Respondent, 2000-2020 Davidson Avenue Realty Corpo-
ration, Bronx, New York, its officers, agents, successors,
and assigns, shall
1.Cease and desist from
(a) Failing and refusing to bargain collectively and in
good faith with the Union as the exclusive collective-
bargaining representative of its unit employees.
(b) In any like or related manner interfering with, re-
straining, or coercing employees in the exe rcise of the
rights guaranteed them by Section 7 of the Act.
2. Take the following affirmative action necessary to
effectuate the policies of the Act.
(a) On request, bargain collectively and in good faith
with the Service Employees International Union, Local
32E, AFL–CIO, as the exclusive collective-bargaining
representative of its employees in the following appro-
priate unit concerning terms and conditions of employ-
ment and, if an understanding is reached, embody the
understanding in a signed agreement:

All employees engaged in servicing, maintaining,
cleaning and performing work of allied nature at 2000-
12-16-20 Davidson Avenue, Bronx, New York,
excluding all other employees, office clerical
employees, professional employees, and guards and
supervisors as d efined in the Act.

(b) Within 14 days after service by the Region, post at
its facility in Bronx, New York, copies of the attached
notice marked “Appendix.”2 Copies of the notice, on
forms provided by the Regional Director for Region 2,
after being signed by the Respondent’s authorized repre-
sentative, shall be posted by the Respondent and main-
tained for 60 consecutive days in conspicuous places
including all places where notices to employees are cus-
tomarily posted. Reasonable steps shall be taken by the
Respondent to ensure that the notices are not altered,
defaced or covered by any other material. In the event
that, during the pendency of these proceedings, the Re-
spondent has gone out of business or closed the facility
involved in these proceedings, the Respondent shall du-
plicate and mail, at its own expense, a copy of the notice
to all current employees and former employees employed
by the Respondent at any time since May 3, 2000.

2 If this Order is enforced by a Judgment of the United States Court of
Appeals, the words in the notice “Posted by Order of the National La-
bor Relations Board’’ shall read “Posted Pursuant to a Judgment of the
United States Court of Appeals Enforcing an Order of the National
Labor Relations Board.’’
2000-2020 DAVIDSON AVENUE REALTY CORP . 3
(c) Within 21 days after service by the Region, file
with the Regional Director a sworn certification of a re -
sponsible official on a form provided by the Region at-
testing to the steps that the Respondent has taken to
comply.
Dated, Washington, D.C. June 21, 2001

Peter J. Hurtgen, Chairman

Wilma B. Liebman, Member

Dennis P. Walsh, Member

(SEAL) NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

APPENDIX
NOTICE TO EMPLOYEES
POSTED BY ORDER OF THE
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
An Agency of the United States Government

The National Labor Relations Board has found that we
violated the National Labor Relations Act and has or-
dered us to post and abide by this notice.

WE WILL NOT fail and refuse to bargain collectively and
in good faith with the Union as the exclusive collective-
bargaining representative of our unit employees.
WE WILL NOT in any like or related manner interfere
with, restrain, or coerce you in the exercise of the rights
guaranteed you by Section 7 of the Act.
WE WILL, on request, bargain collectively and in good
faith with the Service Employees International Union,
Local 32E, AFL–CIO, as the exclusive collective-
bargaining representative of our employees in the follow-
ing appropriate unit concerning terms and conditions of
employment and, if an understanding is reached, embody
the understanding in a signed agreement:

All employees engaged in servicing, maintaining,
cleaning and performing work of allied nature at 2000-
12-16-20 Davidson Avenue, Bronx, New York, ex-
cluding all other employees, office clerical employees,
professional employees, and guards and supervisors as
defined in the Act.

2000-2020 DAVIDSON AVENUE REALTY
CORPORATION