From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zurich-American Insurance v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 2, 1989
74 N.Y.2d 621 (N.Y. 1989)

Opinion

Argued March, 22, 1989

Decided May 2, 1989

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, Andrew R. Tyler, J.

Howard R. Cohen and Sidney Rosen for appellants.

Ignatius John Melito and S. Dwight Stephens for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the majority at the Appellate Division that, because Atlantic's policies extended coverage to employees of the church, the allegations in the complaints that injuries were caused by the putative individual insureds while acting in the church's employ triggered Atlantic's obligation to defend (see, Seaboard Sur. Co. v Gillette Co., 64 N.Y.2d 304, 310). As the court noted, the answers of those individuals, denying that they were church employees, merely posed factual and legal issues to be resolved in the underlying actions.

Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, ALEXANDER, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., and BELLACOSA concur; Judge KAYE taking no part.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Zurich-American Insurance v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 2, 1989
74 N.Y.2d 621 (N.Y. 1989)
Case details for

Zurich-American Insurance v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance

Case Details

Full title:ZURICH-AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANIES, Respondent, v. ATLANTIC MUTUAL…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 2, 1989

Citations

74 N.Y.2d 621 (N.Y. 1989)
541 N.Y.S.2d 970
539 N.E.2d 1098

Citing Cases

State of N.Y. v. Blank

Significantly, an insurer may maintain a contribution action against a co-insurer without complying with the…

Aspen Specialty Ins. Co. v. Risk Retention Grp.

. This rule also applies when, as here, a party who is not a named insured is sued in an underlying tort…