Summary
applying federal common law and the "substantial continuity" test
Summary of this case from U.S. v. Exide CorporationOpinion
No. 97-241.
June 15, 1998.
C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 99 F. 3d 505 and 112 F. 3d 88.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Zollo Drum Co. v. B.F. Goodrich Co.
U.S.
Jun 15, 1998
524 U.S. 926 (1998)
Summaries of
Zollo Drum Co. v. B.F. Goodrich Co.
U.S.
Jun 15, 1998
524 U.S. 926 (1998)
applying federal common law and the "substantial continuity" test
Summary of this case from U.S. v. Exide CorporationCase details for
Zollo Drum Co. v. B.F. Goodrich Co.
Case Details
Full title:ZOLLO DRUM CO., INC., ET AL. v. B. F. GOODRICH Co. ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Jun 15, 1998
Citations
524 U.S. 926 (1998)
Citing Cases
Eubank v. Terminix Int'l, Inc.
(1) it has a "significant protectable interest" relating to the property or transaction that is the subject…
Zuppardo v. Suffolk County Vanderbilt MuseumThe trial court's task is "carefully limited to discerning whether there are any genuine issues of material…