From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zibbell v. Granholm

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Northern Division
Apr 14, 2008
Case No. 2:07-cv-96 (W.D. Mich. Apr. 14, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. 2:07-cv-96.

April 14, 2008


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


On March 19, 2008, Magistrate Judge Timothy P. Greeley submitted a report and recommendation on various motions that are pending before the Court. [Doc. No. 140]. Plaintiffs have filed objections. [Doc. Nos. 147, 149, 151, 154, 156, 159].

After reviewing the record de novo, the Court finds that the plaintiffs' objections are without merit and are DENIED. The Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge's findings of fact and conclusions of law. The Court hereby ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72, and W.D. Mich. LCivR. 72.3.

Accordingly, the plaintiffs' motion for a further hearing before the District Judge [Doc. No. 161] is DENIED.

The motion by defendants Michigan Department of Community Mental Health and Michigan Department of Human Services to dismiss the plaintiffs' complaint under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) [Doc. No. 60] is GRANTED. The motion by defendant Upper Peninsula Power Company to dismiss the plaintiffs' complaint under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) [Doc. No. 94] is GRANTED. The motion by defendant Marquette County Resource Management to dismiss the plaintiffs' complaint under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) [Doc. No. 107] is GRANTED. The motion for summary judgment by defendants Alger-Marquette Community Action Board and Marvin Plotezka [Doc. No. 91] is GRANTED pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. The plaintiffs' entire complaint shall be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to all defendants.

The following motions filed by the plaintiffs are all DENIED: motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 38]; request for direction from the Court [Doc. No. 30]; motions for preliminary injunction [Doc. Nos. 21, 43]; motions for default judgment [Doc. Nos. 54, 126]; motion for restraining order [Doc. No. 66]; motion for order to declare loss [Doc. No. 83]; motions to serve parties [Doc. Nos. 87, 118]; motion to disqualify counsel [Doc. No. 115]; motion to "reject," i.e. motion to strike [Doc. No. 136]; and motion to expedite decision [Doc. No. 137].

A separate final judgment will be entered.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Zibbell v. Granholm

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Northern Division
Apr 14, 2008
Case No. 2:07-cv-96 (W.D. Mich. Apr. 14, 2008)
Case details for

Zibbell v. Granholm

Case Details

Full title:JEFFREY ZIBBELL and CHERYL ZIBBELL, Plaintiffs, v. JENNIFER GRANHOLM, et…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Northern Division

Date published: Apr 14, 2008

Citations

Case No. 2:07-cv-96 (W.D. Mich. Apr. 14, 2008)

Citing Cases

Zibbell v. Michigan Dept

All defendants then filed motions to dismiss or motions for summary judgment to address the remaining ADA…

Zibbell v. Marquette Cnty. Res. Mgmt.

Jeffery and Cheryl Zibbell filed a lawsuit against MCRM and other defendants. The prior civil action is…