Zeilnhofer v. Marcinko

Full title: CHONG ZEILNHOFER et al., Respondents, v. JOLENE MARCINKO et al., Appellants

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 31, 1997

245 A.D.2d 1070 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

666 N.Y.S.2d 77

Opinion

December 31, 1997

Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Wisner, Callahan and Fallon, JJ.

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Defendants failed to make a prima facie showing that Chong Zeilnhofer (plaintiffs did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) ( see, DePetres v. Kaiser, 244 A.D.2d 851; Nigro v. Penree, 238 A.D.2d 908; Thomas v. Hulslander, 233 A.D.2d 567). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Jefferson County, Gilbert, J. — Summary Judgment.)