From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zausner v. Fotochrome, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 18, 1962
18 A.D.2d 649 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

In Zausner v. Fotochrome, Inc., 18 A.D.2d 649, 235 N.Y.S.2d 698, 699(1962), the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, held that "[s]pecial damages must be alleged with sufficient particularity to identify actual losses and related causally to the allegedly tortious act."

Summary of this case from Hannah v. Metro-North Commuter R. Co.
See 1 Summary

Opinion

December 18, 1962

Order, entered July 2, 1962, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. No opinion.

Concur — Botein, P.J., Breitel, Valente, McNally and Eager, JJ.

Summaries of

Zausner v. Fotochrome, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 18, 1962
18 A.D.2d 649 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)

In Zausner v. Fotochrome, Inc., 18 A.D.2d 649, 235 N.Y.S.2d 698, 699(1962), the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, held that "[s]pecial damages must be alleged with sufficient particularity to identify actual losses and related causally to the allegedly tortious act."

Summary of this case from Hannah v. Metro-North Commuter R. Co.
Case details for

Zausner v. Fotochrome, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SAM ZAUSNER et al., Respondents, v. FOTOCHROME, INC., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 18, 1962

Citations

18 A.D.2d 649 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)
235 N.Y.S.2d 698

Citing Cases

Socialist Wrks. Party v. Atty. Gen., U.S.

This refers to actual damages which are not merely presumed from the intention to harm or the overt acts…

Ritner v. Harris, Upham Co.

Nor may her complaint be construed as an action in "prima facie tort". This form of action covers intentional…

16 Citing Cases