From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zachs v. Comm'r of Corr.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 23, 2021
338 Conn. 909 (Conn. 2021)

Summary

providing that," [w] hen a defense declared to be an affirmative defense is raised at a trial, the defendant shall have the burden of establishing such defense by a preponderance of the evidence"

Summary of this case from State v. Roberts

Opinion

09-23-2021

Adam M. ZACHS v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

Jennifer B. Smith and Aaron J. Romano, Bloomfield, in support of the petition. Samantha L. Oden, deputy assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


Jennifer B. Smith and Aaron J. Romano, Bloomfield, in support of the petition.

Samantha L. Oden, deputy assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The petitioner Adam M. Zachs' petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 205 Conn. App. 243, 257 A.3d 423 (2021), is denied.


Summaries of

Zachs v. Comm'r of Corr.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 23, 2021
338 Conn. 909 (Conn. 2021)

providing that," [w] hen a defense declared to be an affirmative defense is raised at a trial, the defendant shall have the burden of establishing such defense by a preponderance of the evidence"

Summary of this case from State v. Roberts
Case details for

Zachs v. Comm'r of Corr.

Case Details

Full title:Adam M. ZACHS v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Sep 23, 2021

Citations

338 Conn. 909 (Conn. 2021)
258 A.3d 1279

Citing Cases

Crenshaw v. Comm'r of Corr.

Moreover, it was undeniably reasonable, if not critical, for Meredith to formulate a strategy that accounted…

State v. Roberts

(Internal quotation marks omitted.) Zachs v.Commissioner of Correction, 205 Conn.App. 243, 254 n.6, 257 A.3d…