From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Young v. Peterson

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Nov 19, 2013
No. 12-16997 (9th Cir. Nov. 19, 2013)

Summary

affirming denial of application to proceed in forma pauperis because plaintiff "failed to allege sufficient facts to show that he was under an imminent danger of serious physical injury when he lodged his complaint"

Summary of this case from Grandinetti v. Hatakeyama

Opinion

No. 12-16997 D.C. No. 1:12-cv-00864-AWI-GBC

11-19-2013

EDDIE YOUNG, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. T. PETERSON; et al., Defendants - Appellees.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Anthony W. Ishii, District Judge, Presiding

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Eddie Young appeals pro se from the district court's order denying his application to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging retaliation and other claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion the denial of an application to proceed in forma pauperis, O'Loughlin v. Doe, 920 F.2d 614, 616 (9th Cir. 1990), and we affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Young's application to proceed in forma pauperis because at least three of Young's prior federal actions were dismissed for failure to state a claim, and Young failed to allege sufficient facts to show that he was under an imminent danger of serious physical injury when he lodged his complaint. See Andrews v. King, 398 F.3d 1113, 1116 n.1 (9th Cir. 2005) (under § 1915(g), commonly known as the "three strikes" provision, a prisoner with three or more prior dismissals for failure to state a claim cannot proceed in forma pauperis); see also Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1055 (9th Cir. 2007) (an exception to the three-strikes rule under § 1915(g) exists only where "the complaint makes a plausible allegation that the prisoner faced 'imminent danger of serious physical injury' at the time of filing").

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Young v. Peterson

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Nov 19, 2013
No. 12-16997 (9th Cir. Nov. 19, 2013)

affirming denial of application to proceed in forma pauperis because plaintiff "failed to allege sufficient facts to show that he was under an imminent danger of serious physical injury when he lodged his complaint"

Summary of this case from Grandinetti v. Hatakeyama

affirming denial of application to proceed in forma pauperis because plaintiff "failed to allege sufficient facts to show that he was under an imminent danger of serious physical injury when he lodged his complaint"

Summary of this case from Grandinetti v. Omni Air Int'l

affirming denial of application to proceed in forma pauperis because plaintiff "failed to allege sufficient facts to show that he was under an imminent danger of serious physical injury when he lodged his complaint"

Summary of this case from Grandinetti v. Hyun

affirming denial of application to proceed in forma pauperis because plaintiff "failed to allege sufficient facts to show that he was under an imminent danger of serious physical injury when he lodged his complaint"

Summary of this case from Grandinetti v. Honolulu Police Dep't

affirming denial of application to proceed in forma pauperis because plaintiff "failed to allege sufficient facts to show that he was under an imminent danger of serious physical injury when he lodged his complaint"

Summary of this case from Grandinetti v. Liaux

affirming denial of application to proceed in forma pauperis because plaintiff "failed to allege sufficient facts to show that he was under an imminent danger of serious physical injury when he lodged his complaint"

Summary of this case from Grandinetti v. Members

affirming denial of application to proceed in forma pauperis because plaintiff "failed to allege sufficient facts to show that he was under an imminent danger of serious physical injury when he lodged his complaint"

Summary of this case from Grandinetti v. Trump

affirming denial of application to proceed in forma pauperis because plaintiff "failed to allege sufficient facts to show that he was under an imminent danger of serious physical injury when he lodged his complaint"

Summary of this case from Grandinetti v. Inst. Div. Adm'rs

affirming denial of application to proceed in forma pauperis because plaintiff "failed to allege sufficient facts to show that he was under an imminent danger of serious physical injury when he lodged his complaint"

Summary of this case from Grandinetti v. Tresch

affirming denial of application to proceed in forma pauperis because plaintiff "failed to allege sufficient facts to show that he was under an imminent danger of serious physical injury when he lodged his complaint"

Summary of this case from Grandinetti v. Dept. of Health

affirming denial of application to proceed in forma pauperis because plaintiff "failed to allege sufficient facts to show that he was under an imminent danger of serious physical injury when he lodged his complaint"

Summary of this case from Grandinetti v. Gruber

affirming denial of application to proceed in forma pauperis because plaintiff "failed to allege sufficient facts to show that he was under an imminent danger of serious physical injury when he lodged his complaint"

Summary of this case from Grandinetti v. Nat'l Guard

affirming denial of application to proceed in forma pauperis because plaintiff "failed to allege sufficient facts to show that he was under an imminent danger of serious physical injury when he lodged his complaint"

Summary of this case from Grandinetti v. Bala

affirming denial of application to proceed in forma pauperis because plaintiff "failed to allege sufficient facts to show that he was under an imminent danger of serious physical injury when he lodged his complaint"

Summary of this case from Grandinetti v. Unit Team Manager
Case details for

Young v. Peterson

Case Details

Full title:EDDIE YOUNG, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. T. PETERSON; et al., Defendants …

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Nov 19, 2013

Citations

No. 12-16997 (9th Cir. Nov. 19, 2013)

Citing Cases

Grandinetti v. Unit Team Manager

Grandinetti fails, therefore, to show that he faced imminent danger of serious physical harm when he filed…

Grandinetti v. Trump

See ECF No. 1. Nothing within Grandinetti's pleading shows or even suggests that he was in imminent danger of…