From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Young v. Nelson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 14, 1965
23 A.D.2d 531 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)

Opinion

January 14, 1965

Appeal from the Niagara Special Term.

Present — Williams, P.J., Goldman, Henry, Noonan and Del Vecchio, JJ.


Order insofar as appealed from unanimously reversed, without costs of this appeal to either party, without prejudice to reapply upon appropriate and adequate papers. Memorandum: CPLR 3211 (subd. [e]) provides that on a motion to dismiss for insufficiency if the opposing party desires leave to plead over in the event the motion is granted "he shall so state in his opposing papers and in them set forth evidence that could properly be considered on a motion for summary judgment in support of a new pleading; leave to plead again shall not be granted unless the court is satisfied that the opposing party has good ground to support his cause of action or defense." The papers submitted for leave to amend the complaint are inadequate in that there is no affidavit by a person having personal knowledge of the facts. (See Cohen v. Pannia, 7 A.D.2d 886.)


Summaries of

Young v. Nelson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 14, 1965
23 A.D.2d 531 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)
Case details for

Young v. Nelson

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL YOUNG, an Infant, by SALLY YOUNG, His Guardian ad Litem…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jan 14, 1965

Citations

23 A.D.2d 531 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)

Citing Cases

Scaccia v. Mack Trucks, Inc.

As per CPLR 3211 (subd [e]), "leave to plead again shall not be granted unless the court is satisfied that…

Piduch v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company

The proposed amendment merely speculates that defendant engaged in a general business practice, and plaintiff…