From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Young v. Hassler

Oregon Court of Appeals
Dec 16, 1986
725 P.2d 1299 (Or. Ct. App. 1986)

Opinion

83-1055-E; CA A37096

Argued and submitted September 18, 1986

Judgment modified to correct description of prescriptive easement and affirmed as modified October 8, 1986 Reconsideration denied November 21, 1986 Petition for review denied December 16, 1986 ( 302 Or. 460)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Josephine County.

Loyd O'Neal, Judge Pro Tempore.

Donald F. Myrick, Grants Pass, argued the cause for appellants. On the briefs were Donald H. Coulter, and Myrick, Coulter, Seagraves, Myrick Adams, Grants Pass.

Wally P. Martin, Grants Pass, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents.

Before Joseph, Chief Judge, and Newman and Deits, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Judgment modified to correct description of prescriptive easement and affirmed as modified.


Plaintiffs claim a prescriptive right to use an easement along the west side of defendants' property. On de novo review, we affirm generally the trial court's judgment for plaintiffs. The parties agree that the language in the judgment saying that the "easement shall proceed from the Southerly boundary of Rogue River Loop Highway to the Southwesterly corner of Plaintiffs' premises" (emphasis supplied) is erroneous and that "Southwesterly" should read "Southeasterly." The judgment is hereby amended accordingly.

Judgment modified as described in the preceding paragraph and affirmed as modified.


Summaries of

Young v. Hassler

Oregon Court of Appeals
Dec 16, 1986
725 P.2d 1299 (Or. Ct. App. 1986)
Case details for

Young v. Hassler

Case Details

Full title:YOUNG et ux, Respondents, v. HASSLER et ux, Appellants

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 16, 1986

Citations

725 P.2d 1299 (Or. Ct. App. 1986)
725 P.2d 1299