Summary
dismissing FCRA claim in which plaintiff alleged that he suffered a decrease in his credit score but no pecuniary or non-pecuniary damage arising from such a decrease
Summary of this case from King v. Bank of Am., N.A.Opinion
Civil Action No. 2:07-CV-31 JVB.
January 27, 2009
MEMORANDUM ORDER
On December 18, 2008, Magistrate Judge Paul R. Cherry filed and served on the parties his Report and Recommendation (DE 74) on Defendant Harris N.A's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's amended complaint (DE 64). Judge Cherry recommended that this Court grant Defendant's Motion. In the Report and Recommendation he advised the parties that they had ten days from the date of service within which to file objections and noted that the failure to file a timely objection would result in waiver of the right to challenge the Recommendation before both the District Court and the Court of Appeals. Willis v. Caterpillar, Inc., 199 F.3d 902, 904 (7th Cir. 1999); Hunger v. Leninger, 15 F.3d 664, 668 (7th Cir. 1994; The Provident Bank v. Manor Steel Corp., 882 F.2d 258, 260-261 (7th Cir. 1989).
To date, Plaintiff has filed no objections to the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, this Court adopts Judge Cherry's recommendations and GRANTS Defendant Harris N.A.'s Motion to Dismiss (DE 64). Harris N.A. is dismissed as a party to this action.
SO ORDERED.