From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Young v. Beard

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 31, 2008
Civil Action No. 06-160 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 31, 2008)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06-160.

March 31, 2008


Re: Dkt. No. [23] MEMORANDUM ORDER


AND NOW, this 31st day of March 2008, it appearing that this Court had previously vacated the order adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, Dkt. [44], in order to permit Plaintiff to file objections within a limited time in light of his representation that he never received the Report, and it further appearing that Plaintiff nevertheless failed to file objections after being afforded the opportunity to do so, the Court hereby readopts the Report as the opinion of the Court and IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion to dismiss filed by defendants Dr. Adam Ebelman, Dr. Michael Herbik, and Prison Health Services, Inc. [Dkt. No. 23] is granted as to plaintiff's procedural due process claims and denied in all other respects. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act, plaintiff's claim that his food is prepared and cooked by prisoners thereby violating the Eighth Amendment is dismissed for failure to state a claim.


Summaries of

Young v. Beard

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 31, 2008
Civil Action No. 06-160 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 31, 2008)
Case details for

Young v. Beard

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD YOUNG, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY BEARD, Secretary of Corrections; JOHN…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 31, 2008

Citations

Civil Action No. 06-160 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 31, 2008)

Citing Cases

Stewart v. Wenerowicz

The protections afforded by the Eighth Amendment against Federal government interference are applied against…