From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Young v. Beard

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
May 22, 2007
Civil Action No. 06-160 (W.D. Pa. May. 22, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06-160.

May 22, 2007


ORDER


AND NOW, this 18th day of May, 2007, after the plaintiff, Richard Young, filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after defendants Dr. Adam Ebelman, Dr. Michael Herbik, and Prison Health Services, Inc., filed a motion to dismiss, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties ten days after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and no objections having been filed, and upon independent review of the motion and the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion to dismiss filed by defendants Dr. Adam Ebelman, Dr. Michael Herbik, and Prison Health Services, Inc. [Dkt. No. 23] is granted as to plaintiff's procedural due process claims and denied in all other respects. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act, plaintiff's claim that his food is prepared and cooked by prisoners thereby violating the Eighth Amendment is dismissed for failure to state a claim.


Summaries of

Young v. Beard

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
May 22, 2007
Civil Action No. 06-160 (W.D. Pa. May. 22, 2007)
Case details for

Young v. Beard

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD YOUNG, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY BEARD, Secretary of Corrections…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: May 22, 2007

Citations

Civil Action No. 06-160 (W.D. Pa. May. 22, 2007)

Citing Cases

Stewart v. Wenerowicz

The protections afforded by the Eighth Amendment against Federal government interference are applied against…