From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chul Hee Yoo v. Vocatura

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 26, 2001
280 A.D.2d 634 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Argued January 25, 2001

February 26, 2001.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (J. Leone, J.), dated November 23, 1999, which, upon a jury verdict that the defendant Linda Vocatura was negligent but that her negligence was not a substantial factor in causing the accident, is in favor of the defendants and against him, dismissing the complaint.

Edward H. Suh and Associates, P.C., Flushing, N.Y. (Peter B. Croly of counsel), for appellant.

Stockschlaeder, McDonald Sules, P.C. (Rivkin, Radler Kremer, LLP, Uniondale, N.Y. [Evan H. Krinick, Cheryl F. Korman, Jack D. Jordan, and Harris J. Zakarin] of counsel), for respondents.

Before: GOLDSTEIN, J.P., FLORIO, LUCIANO and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

A jury verdict should not be set aside unless the jury could not have reached the verdict on any fair interpretation of the evidence (see, Nicastro v. Park, 113 A.D.2d 1 29, 134; Delgado v. Board of Educ., 65 A.D.2d 547, affd 48 N.Y.2d 643). In the present case, there is no basis to set aside the verdict.


Summaries of

Chul Hee Yoo v. Vocatura

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 26, 2001
280 A.D.2d 634 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Chul Hee Yoo v. Vocatura

Case Details

Full title:CHUL HEE YOO, APPELLANT, v. LINDA M. VOCATURA, ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 26, 2001

Citations

280 A.D.2d 634 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
720 N.Y.S.2d 835