From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yenchi v. Ameriprise Fin., Inc.

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
Mar 30, 2016
134 A.3d 51 (Pa. 2016)

Opinion

No. 493 WAL 2015.

03-30-2016

Eugene R. YENCHI and Ruth I. Yenchi, Husband and Wife, Respondents v. AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL, INC., Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc., Riversource Life Insurance Company and Bryan Gregory Holland, Petitioners.


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 30th day of March, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, rephrased for clarity, are as follows:

(1) Whether the Superior Court erred in reversing the decision of the trial court to grant summary judgment in favor of Petitioners on the grounds that Respondents had not adduced sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case that a fiduciary relationship existed between the parties; and
(2) Whether the Superior Court erred in reversing the decision of the trial court with respect to Petitioners' motions in limine and granting Respondents' request for a new trial on their fraudulent misrepresentation and Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law claims.


Summaries of

Yenchi v. Ameriprise Fin., Inc.

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
Mar 30, 2016
134 A.3d 51 (Pa. 2016)
Case details for

Yenchi v. Ameriprise Fin., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:EUGENE R. YENCHI AND RUTH I. YENCHI, HUSBAND AND WIFE, Respondents v…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

Date published: Mar 30, 2016

Citations

134 A.3d 51 (Pa. 2016)

Citing Cases

Yenchi v. Ameriprise Fin., Inc.

This Court granted discretionary review to consider whether the Superior Court erred in reversing the…